Re: [sipcore] draft-barnes-sipcore-rfc4244bis

"Dale Worley" <dworley@nortel.com> Wed, 08 July 2009 18:19 UTC

Return-Path: <dworley@nortel.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B79493A6890 for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 11:19:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.704
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.704 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.105, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wNiFTvVK+Osm for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 11:19:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zrtps0kp.nortel.com (zrtps0kp.nortel.com [47.140.192.56]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43F693A6A41 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 11:18:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zrtphxs1.corp.nortel.com (zrtphxs1.corp.nortel.com [47.140.202.46]) by zrtps0kp.nortel.com (Switch-2.2.6/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id n68IInX02248; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 18:18:49 GMT
Received: from [47.16.90.165] ([47.16.90.165]) by zrtphxs1.corp.nortel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 8 Jul 2009 14:18:33 -0400
From: "Dale Worley" <dworley@nortel.com>
To: Hans Erik van Elburg <ietf.hanserik@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <9ae56b1e0907080232l12d0acc4kde1a245fcabcd95a@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1246996302.5962.33.camel@victoria-pingtel-com.us.nortel.com> <9ae56b1e0907080232l12d0acc4kde1a245fcabcd95a@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: Nortel Networks
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 14:18:32 -0400
Message-Id: <1247077112.3712.10.camel@victoria-pingtel-com.us.nortel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 (2.12.3-5.fc8)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Jul 2009 18:18:33.0511 (UTC) FILETIME=[80D3DB70:01C9FFF8]
Cc: SIPCORE <sipcore@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sipcore] draft-barnes-sipcore-rfc4244bis
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 18:19:15 -0000

On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 11:32 +0200, Hans Erik van Elburg wrote:
> First I thought that you had a point, but then after checking
> 3.6/RFC5234 it turns out that the current syntax is correct.
> 
> 
> 1*DIGIT, means 1 or more digits, which is entirely correct.

Well, yes, I seem to have overlooked that.  OK, cancel my suggestion to
change the BNF.

That means that we really must change the four instances of "digit(s)"
to be "integer(s)" (or number(s)), as the text is now inconsistent with
the BNF.

Dale