[sipcore] Errata report for Errata 2161 for RFC3398, "ISDN User Part (ISUP) to SIP Mapping"
"Worley, Dale R (Dale)" <dworley@avaya.com> Thu, 14 October 2010 15:55 UTC
Return-Path: <dworley@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80A063A6AC4 for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 08:55:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.442
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.442 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.157, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yNTneehjr2os for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 08:55:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com (co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.13.100]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 869183A695D for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 08:55:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.57,330,1283745600"; d="scan'208";a="242716375"
Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.5]) by co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 14 Oct 2010 11:56:44 -0400
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.57,330,1283745600"; d="scan'208";a="526546860"
Received: from dc-us1hcex1.us1.avaya.com (HELO DC-US1HCEX1.global.avaya.com) ([135.11.52.20]) by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP; 14 Oct 2010 11:56:44 -0400
Received: from DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com ([169.254.2.129]) by DC-US1HCEX1.global.avaya.com ([2002:870b:3414::870b:3414]) with mapi; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 11:56:44 -0400
From: "Worley, Dale R (Dale)" <dworley@avaya.com>
To: "sipcore@ietf.org" <sipcore@ietf.org>, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 11:55:28 -0400
Thread-Topic: Errata report for Errata 2161 for RFC3398, "ISDN User Part (ISUP) to SIP Mapping"
Thread-Index: AQHLa7hmrB5yHmenO0+9sp/sdCTkEA==
Message-ID: <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B21FFC79D19@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [sipcore] Errata report for Errata 2161 for RFC3398, "ISDN User Part (ISUP) to SIP Mapping"
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:55:26 -0000
====================================================================== RFC3398, "Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) User Part (ISUP) to Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Mapping" Source of RFC: sipping (rai) Errata ID: 2161 Status: Reported Type: Editorial Reported By: Andrew Miller Date Reported: 2010-04-13 Section 8.2.6.1 says: 504 Version Not Supported 127 Interworking (+) It should say: 505 Version Not Supported 127 Interworking (+) Notes: 504 appears twice with different text. From the context, it looks like the text in the second entry is correct, and the number is wrong. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Recommended status: (correct) Verified (publish) The erratum is correct. The proposed correction is supported by: (1) the correlation between the list of 5xx response codes in 8.2.6.1 and the list in RFC 3261, (2) the definitions and "standard" texts for the 504 and 505 error responses in RFC 3261, (3) the meanings of the paired ISUP cause codes, and (4) footnote "(+)" of the entry "Version Not Supported". The error is relatively minor, but it would be wise to not require every implementer to solve this puzzle again. Therefore I am recommending that it be published (status Verified). ====================================================================== Dale
- [sipcore] Errata report for Errata 2161 for RFC33… Worley, Dale R (Dale)