Re: [sipcore] AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-sipcore-content-id-05 - PULL REQUEST

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Fri, 26 May 2017 11:59 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4720F126E01; Fri, 26 May 2017 04:59:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.22
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.22 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9EHTIpXr6k-Z; Fri, 26 May 2017 04:59:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sessmg22.ericsson.net (sessmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88C1C128B51; Fri, 26 May 2017 04:59:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3a-6e3519a000004a6a-fb-592818853ac7
Received: from ESESSHC007.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.39]) by sessmg22.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id BA.54.19050.58818295; Fri, 26 May 2017 13:59:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSMB109.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.30]) by ESESSHC007.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.39]) with mapi id 14.03.0339.000; Fri, 26 May 2017 13:59:00 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
CC: "draft-ietf-sipcore-content-id.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-sipcore-content-id.all@ietf.org>, "sipcore@ietf.org" <sipcore@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-sipcore-content-id-05 - PULL REQUEST
Thread-Index: AQHS1hd1b6bmbyrEbUuHjC4DfZ2Vqg==
Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 11:58:59 +0000
Message-ID: <D54DF3B2.1D309%christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.7.4.170508
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.18]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <26A699CC292AF84ABFD621142892F84E@ericsson.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFupmkeLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42KZGbFdXbdVQiPSYPEZTYv5nafZLWae3cVi 8fXHJjYHZo8lS34yecza+YQlgCmKyyYlNSezLLVI3y6BK+PR/ZqCWywV03ZMZ2xgfMTcxcjJ ISFgIvH+yjFGEFtI4AijxPTN+V2MXED2YkaJjZO/sXcxcnCwCVhIdP/TBqkREVCSeN68lQWk hlmgg1Hi6ZI+VpCEsICvRNfbG+wQRQESP/duZYKw9SSaT1wHW8AioCrxov00mM0rYC3x4/08 MJtRQEzi+6k1YPXMAuISt57MZ4I4TkBiyZ7zUIeKSrx8/I8V5B5RoJnv9ntChBUlPr7axwjR qidxY+oUNgjbWmLFhJdQcW2JZQtfM0OsFZQ4OfMJywRG0VlIts1C0j4LSfssJO2zkLQvYGRd xShanFpcnJtuZKSXWpSZXFycn6eXl1qyiREYRQe3/LbawXjwueMhRgEORiUe3hwBjUgh1sSy 4srcQ4wSHMxKIrw24kAh3pTEyqrUovz4otKc1OJDjNIcLErivA77LkQICaQnlqRmp6YWpBbB ZJk4OKUaGPkSiqymeF8Nu65nca1Jfu6Bidpvw19aRmdsTZl3e37GoecssSmi4lfPeBhEfWs8 rvusJLVHcuJFoT0cx9p+ie/3enP+94fSz9O2yt+VNGD+x37fPnHB4Rl33+o/CpY/0Hpbmjud 7dd9sZnb8o7PsV6jcJ7pXEGN2mcp288HNBoOL/iz5uW/9EAlluKMREMt5qLiRABkYYwnngIA AA==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sipcore/jduZOiyN2oNeu2s9i59pIgc1dWQ>
Subject: Re: [sipcore] AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-sipcore-content-id-05 - PULL REQUEST
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sipcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 11:59:05 -0000

Hi Ben,

I have created a pull request, based on your comments:

https://github.com/cdh4u/draft-content-id/pull/6


However, I wasn¹t sure how to address the following comment:

"1.2 and 1.3: A sentence or two that more strongly contrasts "body part"
vs "message-body" would be helpful. I think that some people will think of
a message-body as still a body-part.²

I think section 1.1 describes the difference between a message-body and a
body-part. I don¹t think we should copy/paste that in sections 1.2 and
1.3. Or, did I misunderstand you comment?

Regards,

Christer