IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Mon, 20 March 2017 23:26 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F3EF12EE45 for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 16:26:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.881
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.881 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XQLmST3XOMI3 for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 16:26:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D37B4129412 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 16:26:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Orochi.local (99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v2KNQZ2T064837 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 20 Mar 2017 18:26:36 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228] claimed to be Orochi.local
To: Paul Kyzivat <paul.kyzivat@comcast.net>, sipcore@ietf.org
References: <148893258669.17675.7013326933036466908.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <15aeb1be62a.11b35bf8267637.2121189919710903185@ovsienko.info> <61afa707-5a0f-2ae2-b862-f373a84e6e76@comcast.net>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <b860fc9e-68b4-0589-52e8-5a7151fc9e20@nostrum.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 18:26:30 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <61afa707-5a0f-2ae2-b862-f373a84e6e76@comcast.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sipcore/nXhp7ixWjNXpnp_i5_rWhE6f8yQ>
Subject: Re: [sipcore] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04.txt> (A SIP Response Code for Unwanted Calls) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sipcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 23:26:41 -0000

[as chair]

On 3/20/17 10:29, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
> [Trimming the distribution to sipcore to minimize the disruption.] 


To be clear, this is an IETF LC comment. For better or worse (in 
practice, it's a mix of both), such conversations take place on the 
ietf@ietf.org mailing list to ensure that the document has the consensus 
of the IETF as a whole, rather than just the consensus of their 
originating working group. I understand the desire to be less 
disruptive, but we also don't want to restrict the discussion to a 
smaller venue than is appropriate. Please direct future comments in this 
thread to the ietf@ietf.org mailing list.

Thanks!

/a

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email