Re: [sipcore] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-sparks-sipcore-refer-clarifications-03.txt

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Thu, 14 August 2014 20:42 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 607C61A8770 for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 13:42:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.568
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.568 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TyO9sZVhmPVn for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 13:42:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90FCA1A8777 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 13:42:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Orochi.local (99-152-145-110.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.145.110]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s7EKghoY085270 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 14 Aug 2014 15:42:45 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-145-110.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.145.110] claimed to be Orochi.local
Message-ID: <53ED1F43.50303@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 15:42:43 -0500
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ivo Sedlacek <ivo.sedlacek@ericsson.com>, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>, Andrew Allen <aallen@blackberry.com>, "sipcore@ietf.org" <sipcore@ietf.org>
References: <20140728221604.19558.73431.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <53D6CC3D.4000005@nostrum.com> <39B5E4D390E9BD4890E2B310790061011270A76B@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se> <53D7BB5D.5010402@nostrum.com> <BBF5DDFE515C3946BC18D733B20DAD233991419A@XMB122CNC.rim.net> <53D92314.6040607@nostrum.com> <39B5E4D390E9BD4890E2B310790061011270B9E1@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se> <39B5E4D390E9BD4890E2B310790061011270BA18@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se> <39B5E4D390E9BD4890E2B310790061011270C376@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se> <53E3BD65.5080105@nostrum.com> <39B5E4D390E9BD4890E2B3107900610112711567@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se> <39B5E4D390E9BD4890E2B3107900610112711708@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se> <53EA2BCC.2080306@nostrum.com> <39B5E4D390E9BD4890E2B3107900610112711DE0@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se> <53EB757E.5000601@nostrum.com> <39B5E4D390E9BD4890E2B310790061011271222B@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se> <53EB83C3.9040807@nostrum.com> <39B5E4D390E9BD4890E2B31079006101127122B0@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <39B5E4D390E9BD4890E2B31079006101127122B0@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sipcore/ne9SZCSQHesaQ3QYMaRXUvuMFv0
Subject: Re: [sipcore] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-sparks-sipcore-refer-clarifications-03.txt
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 20:42:55 -0000

On 8/13/14 10:37, Ivo Sedlacek wrote:
> Imagine that UA:
> - sent NOTIFY to received SUBSCRIBE in dialog X, subscription still exists
> - sent SUBSCRIBE and received NOTIFY in dialog Y, subscription still exists
> - sent INVITE and received 200 OK in dialog Z, session still exists
>
> Are you stating that the UA performs statement mandated for notifier below also when sending messages in dialog Y and dialog Z?

Yes.

/a