Re: [sipcore] Draft new version: draft-holmberg-sipcore-proxy-feature

[Adam Roach <[e-mail]>]

[as an individual]

On 1/27/11 7:55 AM, Christer Holmberg wrote:
> But, if you now are saying that, unless there is a non-IMS use-case, IETF (or, at least SIPCORE) is no more going to accept doing any work for 3GPP, I really think 3GPP should be informed about that.

Heh. If I were to make that kind of statement, it would be as a chair, 
and in coordination with the area directors. But that's not what I said, 
or meant to imply. I said things would "get trickier," meaning you'll 
face opposition from the members of the working group that hold 
generality as a key SIP attribute.

I'm pointing out, just as a participant, that you will have a harder 
time drumming up interest for a niche mechanism than you will for a 
general one.

Another hurdle you're going to face is harmonizing your proposal with 
RFC 5897. All three of your examples rely on doing, just about as 
vigorously as possible, precisely what RFC 5897 says not to do.

/a