IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sipcore] Verify draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis-callflows-02.txt

worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) Wed, 20 February 2013 15:43 UTC

Return-Path: <worley@shell01.TheWorld.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AA1621F87BA for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 07:43:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.663
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.663 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.317, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nCm9eFhLfqLh for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 07:43:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from TheWorld.com (pcls2.std.com [192.74.137.142]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23BEB21F883B for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 07:43:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shell.TheWorld.com (root@shell01.theworld.com [192.74.137.71]) by TheWorld.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r1KFgs4l023864; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:42:57 -0500
Received: from shell01.TheWorld.com (localhost.theworld.com [127.0.0.1]) by shell.TheWorld.com (8.13.6/8.12.8) with ESMTP id r1KFgsiM2208980; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:42:54 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from worley@localhost) by shell01.TheWorld.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id r1KFgrE02210959; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:42:53 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:42:53 -0500
Message-Id: <201302201542.r1KFgrE02210959@shell01.TheWorld.com>
From: worley@ariadne.com
Sender: worley@ariadne.com
To: Shida Schubert <shida@ntt-at.com>
In-reply-to: <5EB99B90-9711-4865-88CE-C4F50FB08E39@ntt-at.com> (shida@ntt-at.com)
References: <20130129204912.30730.77135.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <510C4370.6020306@alum.mit.edu> <201302042053.r14KrZ9j1204625@shell01.TheWorld.com> <5EB99B90-9711-4865-88CE-C4F50FB08E39@ntt-at.com>
Cc: sipcore@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sipcore] Verify draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis-callflows-02.txt
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:43:07 -0000

> From: Shida Schubert <shida@ntt-at.com>

[everything you write is fine with me]

> > * "5. In draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis-callflows-01, examples 3.6 and 3.7
> > do not show the History-Info value in the final 200 response to the
> > UAC.  This final value would be useful, in particular, because they
> > give further examples of how proxies process History-Info."
> > 
> > In neither of these examples is the final 200 response shown.  I
> > assume that this is the authors' intention.
> 
>  This, I think was because the value of h-i would not change from 
> the last proxy to UAC, and didn't see a need. If you want to see this 
> added. I will add them

I agree that there is no need.  I believe I was under a
misapprehension when I wrote point 5.

Dale

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email