(sipp) NSAPA mapping into IPv6
Ran Atkinson <atkinson@sundance.itd.nrl.navy.mil> Wed, 03 August 1994 03:15 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa18766; 2 Aug 94 23:15 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa18762; 2 Aug 94 23:15 EDT
Received: from Sun.COM by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa22993; 2 Aug 94 23:15 EDT
Received: from Eng.Sun.COM (zigzag.Eng.Sun.COM) by Sun.COM (sun-barr.Sun.COM) id AA21287; Tue, 2 Aug 94 20:14:33 PDT
Received: from sunroof2.Eng.Sun.COM by Eng.Sun.COM (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA16405; Tue, 2 Aug 94 20:14:48 PDT
Received: by sunroof2.Eng.Sun.COM (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA00292; Tue, 2 Aug 94 20:16:43 PDT
Received: from Eng.Sun.COM (engnews1) by sunroof2.Eng.Sun.COM (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA03391; Tue, 2 Aug 94 10:19:15 PDT
Received: from Sun.COM (sun-barr) by Eng.Sun.COM (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA14609; Tue, 2 Aug 94 10:16:48 PDT
Received: from sundance.itd.nrl.navy.mil by Sun.COM (sun-barr.Sun.COM) id AA18676; Tue, 2 Aug 94 10:16:03 PDT
To: sipp@sunroof2.eng.sun.com
Subject: (sipp) NSAPA mapping into IPv6
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 1994 16:09:53 +0000
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Ran Atkinson <atkinson@sundance.itd.nrl.navy.mil>
Message-Id: <9408021609.aa14982@sundance.itd.nrl.navy.mil>
X-Orig-Sender: owner-sipp@sunroof.eng.sun.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: sipp@sunroof.eng.sun.com
Brian, I also would like to see the G bit disappear. If/when CLNP multicasting gets completely sorted out, it can be addressed further at that time. My preferance would be to map CLNP multicast groups into the IPv6 multicast group address space and not consume additional IPv6 address space. All, A general comment, not particularly directed at Brian's work, is that the community needs to be careful to reserve most of the IPv6 address space for future use and minimise the amount of address space that is initially allocated to any use. I agree with Steve Deering's observation that there is a natural tendency to think we have lots of address space and so some folks erroneously believe that we don't need to be as careful in allocating it. I think that mappings from IPX addresses and currently-in-use NSAPAs are useful. It is not at all clear to me that mappings from E.164 addresses (that is, telephone numbers) into IPv6 addresses is a wise use of IPv6 address space. Regards, Ran atkinson@itd.nrl.navy.mil ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ IETF SIPP Working Group - Archives: parcftp.xerox.com:/pub/sipp Unsubscribe: unsubscribe sipp (as message body, not subject) Direct all administrative requests to majordomo@sunroof.eng.sun.com
- (sipp) NSAPA mapping into IPv6 Ran Atkinson