Re: (sipp) Loopback & SST
Steve Deering <deering@parc.xerox.com> Tue, 19 July 1994 16:40 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08851; 19 Jul 94 12:40 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08847; 19 Jul 94 12:40 EDT
Received: from Sun.COM by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13140; 19 Jul 94 12:40 EDT
Received: from Eng.Sun.COM (zigzag.Eng.Sun.COM) by Sun.COM (sun-barr.Sun.COM) id AA08224; Tue, 19 Jul 94 09:19:42 PDT
Received: from sunroof2.Eng.Sun.COM by Eng.Sun.COM (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA07332; Tue, 19 Jul 94 09:20:32 PDT
Received: by sunroof2.Eng.Sun.COM (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA00949; Tue, 19 Jul 94 09:21:29 PDT
Received: from Eng.Sun.COM (engnews1) by sunroof2.Eng.Sun.COM (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA00943; Tue, 19 Jul 94 09:21:23 PDT
Received: from Sun.COM (sun-barr) by Eng.Sun.COM (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA18968; Tue, 19 Jul 94 09:19:10 PDT
Received: from alpha.xerox.com by Sun.COM (sun-barr.Sun.COM) id AA08051; Tue, 19 Jul 94 09:18:52 PDT
Received: from skylark.parc.xerox.com ([13.2.116.7]) by alpha.xerox.com with SMTP id <14470(4)>; Tue, 19 Jul 1994 09:18:34 PDT
Received: from localhost by skylark.parc.xerox.com with SMTP id <12171>; Tue, 19 Jul 1994 09:18:25 -0700
To: "Daniel L. McDonald" <danmcd@sundance.itd.nrl.navy.mil>
Cc: sipp@sunroof.eng.sun.com
Subject: Re: (sipp) Loopback & SST
In-Reply-To: owner-sipp's message of Mon, 18 Jul 94 14:03:00 -0800. <9407182103.aa25696@sundance.itd.nrl.navy.mil>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 1994 09:18:12 -0700
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Steve Deering <deering@parc.xerox.com>
Message-Id: <94Jul19.091825pdt.12171@skylark.parc.xerox.com>
X-Orig-Sender: owner-sipp@sunroof.eng.sun.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: sipp@sunroof.eng.sun.com
> With SST taking the all-zeroes prefix for itself, what will happen to other > well-known SIPP addresses with all-zero prefixes, particularly loopback? Dan, See the new addressing spec. As you surmised, the loopback address did change. > One solution might be to move the SIPP loopback address somewhere else in > the address space. For example, an all-nodes multicast with intra-node > scope sounds awfully like a loopback to me, but I'm not multicast expert. The loopback address may be used a source address, whereas a multicast adress may not. > Speaking of loopback, what will be the netmask for such an address? All ones. Steve ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ IETF SIPP Working Group - Archives: parcftp.xerox.com:/pub/sipp Unsubscribe: unsubscribe sipp (as message body, not subject) Direct all administrative requests to majordomo@sunroof.eng.sun.com
- (sipp) Loopback & SST owner-sipp
- Re: (sipp) Loopback & SST Steve Deering
- Re: (sipp) Loopback & SST William Allen Simpson
- Re: (sipp) Loopback & SST Steve Deering
- Re: (sipp) Loopback & SST Matt Crawford