Re: Static IP addresses for Dial-up

Robert Elz <kre@munnari.oz.au> Mon, 29 January 1996 18:30 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa28129; 29 Jan 96 13:30 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa28125; 29 Jan 96 13:30 EST
Received: from nico.aarnet.edu.au by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12422; 29 Jan 96 13:30 EST
Received: from mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU (mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU [128.250.1.22]) by nico.aarnet.edu.au (8.6.10/8.6.10) with SMTP id CAA14322 for <cidrd@iepg.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 1996 02:20:34 +1100
Received: from muri.cs.mu.OZ.AU by mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU with SMTP (5.83--+1.3.1+0.50); id AA02835 Tue, 30 Jan 1996 02:19:11 +1100 (from kre@munnari.OZ.AU)
To: Paul Ferguson <pferguso@cisco.com>
Cc: Brian Carpenter CERN-CN <brian@dxcoms.cern.ch>, peter@unipalm.pipex.com, nanog@merit.edu, cidrd@iepg.org, iab@isi.edu
Subject: Re: Static IP addresses for Dial-up
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 29 Jan 1996 08:12:37 CDT." <199601291311.FAA04274@lint.cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 1996 02:19:27 +1100
Message-Id: <9876.822928767@munnari.OZ.AU>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Robert Elz <kre@munnari.oz.au>

    Date:        Mon, 29 Jan 1996 08:12:37 -0500
    From:        Paul Ferguson <pferguso@cisco.com>;
    Message-ID:  <199601291311.FAA04274@lint.cisco.com>;

    I can certainly understand the need for access control & security, but
    with the use of a smart-card one-time password system, this is a moot
    point. 

You're expecting me to obtain one of those things for my system
at home?   And assuming that password type capable access
protection is the only kind of protection I care about.

Lets be a little reasonable please - access filters aren't
dead yet (I would like to see them vanish, and I would hope that
one day that might happen, today isn't that day).

I will believe this has happened when cisco no longer support
packet filtering in their routers.

kre