IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: (sipp) New SIPP Addressing Draft

Brian Carpenter CERN-CN <brian@dxcoms.cern.ch> Wed, 20 July 1994 06:34 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01472; 20 Jul 94 2:34 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01468; 20 Jul 94 2:34 EDT
Received: from Sun.COM by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00840; 20 Jul 94 2:34 EDT
Received: from Eng.Sun.COM (zigzag.Eng.Sun.COM) by Sun.COM (sun-barr.Sun.COM) id AA19018; Tue, 19 Jul 94 23:31:27 PDT
Received: from sunroof2.Eng.Sun.COM by Eng.Sun.COM (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA03393; Tue, 19 Jul 94 23:32:33 PDT
Received: by sunroof2.Eng.Sun.COM (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA00894; Tue, 19 Jul 94 23:33:20 PDT
Received: from Eng.Sun.COM (engnews1) by sunroof2.Eng.Sun.COM (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA00888; Tue, 19 Jul 94 23:33:13 PDT
Received: from Sun.COM (sun-barr) by Eng.Sun.COM (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA18281; Tue, 19 Jul 94 23:30:54 PDT
Received: from dxmint.cern.ch by Sun.COM (sun-barr.Sun.COM) id AA18962; Tue, 19 Jul 94 23:30:43 PDT
Received: from dxcoms.cern.ch by dxmint.cern.ch (5.65/DEC-Ultrix/4.3) id AA17042; Wed, 20 Jul 1994 08:30:41 +0200
Received: by dxcoms.cern.ch (5.65/DEC-Ultrix/4.3) id AA13537; Wed, 20 Jul 1994 08:30:40 +0200
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Brian Carpenter CERN-CN <brian@dxcoms.cern.ch>
Message-Id: <9407200630.AA13537@dxcoms.cern.ch>
Subject: Re: (sipp) New SIPP Addressing Draft
To: sipp@sunroof.eng.sun.com
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 1994 08:30:39 +0200
In-Reply-To: <2881.bill.simpson@um.cc.umich.edu> from "William Allen Simpson" at Jul 20, 94 02:31:36 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL22]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 520
X-Orig-Sender: owner-sipp@sunroof.eng.sun.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: sipp@sunroof.eng.sun.com

Bill,
> 
> You describe a NSAP format, but not the more important IPX one.  Please
> leave it in somebody else's separate draft.  Who gives a damn about
> worthless NSAPs?  IPX is a real widely deployed protocol.

Why don't *you* write down the IPX mapping? It is certainly much easier
to do than the NSAPA mapping, since there enough bits.

Since 20% of my off-site traffic is CLNP and 0% of it is
IPX, I didn't feel motivated by the latter...

[We did 98 Gbytes of CLNP in June compared to 405 Gbytes of IP.]

  Brian
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF SIPP Working Group - Archives:  parcftp.xerox.com:/pub/sipp
Unsubscribe:	unsubscribe sipp		(as message body, not subject)
Direct all administrative requests to majordomo@sunroof.eng.sun.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email