Re: (sipp) E.164 mapping into IPv6

[William Allen Simpson <[e-mail]>]

> From: [e-mail] (William Manning)
> Does this mean we can haul out the old E164 mappings in DN code?
>
Bill, I don't understand the reference.

Bob, the way I did it in my 64-bit was to assign a second block to E.164,
which was equal in size to IEEE 802.   That's more than enough for the
official number of E.164 addresses, with the maximum levels.

How about:
                                ...0000-0000 Unspecified unicast
                                ...0000-0001 unused (IP4 net 0)
                                ...0100-0000 legacy IP4 unicast
                                ...e000-0000 unused
                             ...40-0000-0000 legacy AppleTalk
                             ...80-0000-0000 unused
                         ...1-0000-0000-0000 local use E.164
                         ...2-0000-0000-0000 local use IEEE 802
                         ...3-0000-0000-0000 unused
     0000-0000-0001-0000-0000-0000-0000-0000 legacy NSAP
     0000-0000-ffff-0000-0000-0000-0000-0000 legacy IPX
     0001...                                 unicast
     ff...                                   multicast

[e-mail]
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF SIPP Working Group - Archives:  parcftp.xerox.com:/pub/sipp
Unsubscribe:	unsubscribe sipp		(as message body, not subject)
Direct all administrative requests to [e-mail]