Re: [Sipping-emergency] Re: [Sipping-emergency] draft-schulzrinne-sipping-emergency-req-00

The last-mile requirements are in a separate section, so I'm not sure I 
see the problem. (Besides, quite frankly, I'm not sure what needs to be 
done, SIP-wise, for the short-term issues. As I said, this is 
effectively an ACD with conference recording. It might be useful to say 
that, but I think we might make some progress if we can identify, at 
least within the design team, the likely areas needing work for the 
last-mile case. There are, to be sure, other useful ways to apply IP in 
the last-mile case, but those are effectively geopriv territory, namely 
the authorized retrieval of location information given an E.164 identifier.)

Allison Mankin wrote:
> Henning,
> 
> The problem with expressing all the requirements is that it
> will not guide the work and discussion on the shorter-term goals
> properly.
> 
> Allison

_______________________________________________
Sipping-emergency mailing list
Sipping-emergency@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping-emergency