RE: [Sipping-emergency] New revision of proposed ECRIT charter
Tschofenig Hannes <hannes.tschofenig@siemens.com> Thu, 28 October 2004 09:24 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA22985 for <sipping-emergency-web-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 05:24:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CN6kj-0004XJ-Ea for sipping-emergency-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 05:39:29 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CN6VW-0002Kw-Ei; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 05:23:46 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CN6SQ-0001j7-90 for sipping-emergency@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 05:20:34 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA22706 for <sipping-emergency@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 05:20:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from goliath.siemens.de ([192.35.17.28]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CN6gS-0004ST-N5 for sipping-emergency@ietf.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 05:35:05 -0400
Received: from mail3.siemens.de (mail3.siemens.de [139.25.208.14]) by goliath.siemens.de (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i9S9KUP6011718; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 11:20:30 +0200
Received: from mchp9daa.mch.sbs.de (mchp9daa.mch.sbs.de [139.25.137.99]) by mail3.siemens.de (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i9S9KTBO026793; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 11:20:29 +0200
Received: by mchp9daa.mch.sbs.de with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id <4BVR7K5C>; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 11:20:29 +0200
Message-ID: <2A8DB02E3018D411901B009027FD3A3F051C88C0@mchp905a.mch.sbs.de>
From: Tschofenig Hannes <hannes.tschofenig@siemens.com>
To: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>, "Abbott, Nadine B." <nabbott@telcordia.com>, "Peterson, Jon" <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>
Subject: RE: [Sipping-emergency] New revision of proposed ECRIT charter
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 11:20:25 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cd26b070c2577ac175cd3a6d878c6248
Cc: sipping-emergency@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: sipping-emergency@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: sipping-emergency.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping-emergency>, <mailto:sipping-emergency-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:sipping-emergency@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipping-emergency-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping-emergency>, <mailto:sipping-emergency-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: sipping-emergency-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: sipping-emergency-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: b7b9551d71acde901886cc48bfc088a6
hi james, some data items seem to be part of the pidf-lo work. however, as nadine mentioned there are additional fields: - Customer Name, - Class of Service--Residence, Business, Public, etc. - information about/from a VoIP/Communications Service Provider this information is not included in the pidf-lo. is this use case for saml you are often talking about? ciao hannes > -----Original Message----- > From: James M. Polk [mailto:jmpolk@cisco.com] > Sent: Donnerstag, 21. Oktober 2004 17:33 > To: Abbott, Nadine B.; Peterson, Jon > Cc: sipping-emergency@ietf.org > Subject: RE: [Sipping-emergency] New revision of proposed > ECRIT charter > > Isn't most of this an extension to the PIDF-LO effort in > Geopriv, and not part of ECRIT? > > The portion that I believe is part of SIP/PING would be the > addition of a body part by the VSP (in add the contact info > you want) - which has so far been frowned upon (to say the > least) in these WGs > > At 10:57 AM 10/21/2004 -0400, Abbott, Nadine B. wrote: > >Jon, > > > >In the North American National Emergency Number Association > (NENA) VoIP > >Location WG, we have been grappling with the problem of how > additional > >information relevant to an emergency call might be carried to the > emergency > >call taker. For example, this might include information about the > caller > >(e.g., Customer Name, Class of Service--Residence, Business, Public, > etc.) > >and information about/from a VoIP/Communications Service Provider > (e.g., > >contact information for that provider) that are relevant to an > emergency > >call. We are not yet ready (before this next meeting) to provide a > list of > >proposed requirements. > >However, I wondered if you consider that the charter for ECRIT, as > written, > >covers the issue of how such information--caller supplied and/or > service > >provider supplied--might be carried in SIP? > > > >Respectfully, > >Nadine Abbott > >NENA VoIP Location WG team leader > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Sipping-emergency mailing list > >Sipping-emergency@ietf.org > >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping-emergency > > > cheers, > James > > ******************* > Truth is not to be argued... it is to be presented > > > _______________________________________________ > Sipping-emergency mailing list > Sipping-emergency@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping-emergency > _______________________________________________ Sipping-emergency mailing list Sipping-emergency@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping-emergency
- [Sipping-emergency] New revision of proposed ECRI… Peterson, Jon
- RE: [Sipping-emergency] New revision of proposed … Brian Rosen
- RE: [Sipping-emergency] New revision of proposed … Marc Linsner
- Re: [Sipping-emergency] New revision of proposed … Henning Schulzrinne
- RE: [Sipping-emergency] New revision of proposed … wilcox
- Re: [Sipping-emergency] New revision of proposed … Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [Sipping-emergency] New revision of proposed … Tom Taylor
- RE: [Sipping-emergency] New revision of proposed … Roger Marshall
- RE: [Sipping-emergency] New revision of proposed … Peterson, Jon
- RE: [Sipping-emergency] New revision of proposed … Roger Marshall
- RE: [Sipping-emergency] New revision of proposed … Abbott, Nadine B.
- RE: [Sipping-emergency] New revision of proposed … James M. Polk
- RE: [Sipping-emergency] New revision of proposed … Tschofenig Hannes
- RE: [Sipping-emergency] New revision of proposed … James M. Polk
- Re: [Sipping-emergency] New revision of proposed … Henning Schulzrinne
- RE: [Sipping-emergency] New revision of proposed … Tschofenig Hannes
- Re: [Sipping-emergency] New revision of proposed … Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [Sipping-emergency] New revision of proposed … James M. Polk
- Re: [Sipping-emergency] New revision of proposed … Henning Schulzrinne
- RE: [Sipping-emergency] New revision of proposed … Abbott, Nadine B.