Re: [Sipping-emergency] Re: [Sipping-emergency] draft-schulzrinne-sipping-emergency-req-00

Allison,

if you're referring to our joint phone discussion (the only one I was in 
on), I took away from that conversation that requirements for both 
aspects were needed. Indeed, I believe that we're seriously 
short-changing needed developments if we can't get to work on the 
end-to-end requirements soon. Last-mile will not support VoIP terminals 
except if these are in local PBX-mode only (i.e., attached to a PSTN 
gateway in the same building or on the same campus). While public 
IP-accessible ECC may still be a few years away, private arrangements, 
either similar to onStar or corporate/campus security centers, seem 
likely sooner than that.

For what it's worth, the last-mile requirements are essentially the same 
requirements as a PBX with ACD.

Henning

Allison Mankin wrote:
> Henning, 
> 
> Apologies for not paying enough attention to this list.  I am somewhat
> concerned with the scope of your requirements.  We had an AD/Chair discussion
> of restricting initial work to Last-Mile, with explanation of the benefit
> of an initial, fairly tractable and useful problem set.   This is not following
> that restriction.
> 
> Allison

_______________________________________________
Sipping-emergency mailing list
Sipping-emergency@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping-emergency