AW: [Sipping-tispan] Requirements 02e

In principle I have nothing against such an approach.
But what is in the case of diverting the communication.
So that the to header is different from the P-Asserted-Identity and the identity in the to header belongs not to the user where the communication was sent to originally?

Roland

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Bemmel, Jeroen van (Jeroen) [mailto:jbemmel@lucent.com] 
> Gesendet: Freitag, 23. September 2005 12:34
> An: Jesske, Roland; pkyzivat@cisco.com; Miguel.An.Garcia@nokia.com
> Cc: sipping-tispan@ietf.org
> Betreff: RE: [Sipping-tispan] Requirements 02e
> 
> 
> > So we want the have the same within SIP. In forward direction 
> > we have the From header and the P-Asserted-Identity. But in 
> > Backward direction the equivalent to the From header is missing.
> > 
> > So we need such an identity header for the backward direction 
> > setup from the callee.
> > 
> > Roland
> 
> What if the callee would simply add a parameter to the To 
> header? Something like
> To: 
> <sip:callee@provider.com>;tag=25425741;identity=user@altprovider.com
> 
> Jeroen
> 

_______________________________________________
Sipping-tispan mailing list
Sipping-tispan@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping-tispan