Re: AW: [Sipping-tispan] draft-jesske-sipping-tispan-requirements-02c

Miguel,

I believe that we can just drop the override feature, there are ways of
handling the issues that just don't need to be in the protocol
specification.

Therefore I support the use of the description proposed by Christian. I
note in passing that the requirment REQ-ACR-2 is actually stronger than the
equivalent text in EN 300 798 where the presence of a note significantly
weakens it, but it seems a perfectly reasonable and socially useful
requirement to maintain.

Phil

                      Miguel Garcia                                                                                                       
                      <Miguel.An.Garcia@no        To:       "Schmidt, Christian" <christian-schmidt@siemens.com>                          
                      kia.com>                    cc:       sipping-tispan@ietf.org, "Alexeitsev, D" <D.Alexeitsev@t-com.net>             
                      Sent by:                    Subject:  Re: AW: [Sipping-tispan] draft-jesske-sipping-tispan-requirements-02c         
                      sipping-tispan-bounc                                                                                                
                      es@ietf.org                                                                                                         

                      01/09/2005 10:00                                                                                                    

This is ok, but can we remove the "override" feature?

/Miguel

Schmidt, Christian wrote:

> Hi,
>
> if the override request is skipped, we can simplify the ACR requirements
to
>
> "This service allows a callee to instruct the network to automatically
reject
> incoming communications when the caller has requested anonymity.  The ACR
> supplementary service is described in ETSI EN 300 798 [13].
>
> ACR is a regulatory service.
>
> REQ-ACR-1: The originating network shall be able to indicate to the
>            terminating network, that the caller has requested anonymity.
>
> REQ-ACR-2: The ACR simulation service requires the caller to be
>            informed that the communication was rejected because the
>            SIP request was anonymous and the callee had the ACR
>            service activated."
>
> What do you think about?
> Christian
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: sipping-tispan-bounces@ietf.org
[mailto:sipping-tispan-bounces@ietf.org] Im Auftrag von Miguel Garcia
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. September 2005 09:50
> An: sipping-tispan@ietf.org
> Cc: Alexeitsev, D
> Betreff: [Sipping-tispan] draft-jesske-sipping-tispan-requirements-02c
>
>
> Hi:
>
> I have put a new working copy of the requirements draft.
>
>
http://people.nokia.net/~miguel/drafts/pre/draft-jesske-sipping-tispan-requirements-02c.txt

>
http://people.nokia.net/~miguel/drafts/pre/draft-jesske-sipping-tispan-requirements-02c.html

>
> Changes with respect the previous version.
>
> - ACR: added a second requirement (REQ-ACR-2) that was discussed here in
> the list, but I kept the old REQ-ACR-2 that now becomes -3.
>
> - I have added CCBS/CCNR, combined into a single set of requirements.
>
> I will start a separate thread , per topic, on both requirements, I
> think we need more changes. Please comment on these or any other service
> as you wish.
>
> /Miguel
>

--
Miguel A. Garcia           tel:+358-50-4804586
sip:miguel.an.garcia@openlaboratory.net
Nokia Research Center      Helsinki, Finland

_______________________________________________
Sipping-tispan mailing list
Sipping-tispan@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping-tispan

_______________________________________________
Sipping-tispan mailing list
Sipping-tispan@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping-tispan