Re: [Sipping-tispan] Requirements -02g

"ZhouQing(Justin)" <zhouqing@huawei.com> Thu, 29 September 2005 10:23 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EKvZO-00015g-VG; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 06:23:18 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EKvZO-00015V-4i for sipping-tispan@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 06:23:18 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA01411 for <sipping-tispan@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 06:23:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com ([61.144.161.53] helo=huawei.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EKvgw-0005V3-Cw for sipping-tispan@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 06:31:12 -0400
Received: from huawei.com (szxga01-in [172.24.2.3]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0INK00FBLQHKQR@szxga01-in.huawei.com> for sipping-tispan@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 18:29:44 +0800 (CST)
Received: from szxml01-in ([172.24.1.3]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0INK006RBQHKWV@szxga01-in.huawei.com> for sipping-tispan@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 18:29:44 +0800 (CST)
Received: from z45678 ([10.76.176.93]) by szxml01-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTPA id <0INK0042UQPLUA@szxml01-in.huawei.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 18:34:33 +0800 (CST)
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 18:23:27 +0800
From: "ZhouQing(Justin)" <zhouqing@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [Sipping-tispan] Requirements -02g
To: Miguel Garcia <Miguel.An.Garcia@nokia.com>, sipping-tispan@ietf.org
Message-id: <00b701c5c4df$d51fa860$5db04c0a@huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
References: <433A7DB6.9070808@nokia.com>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 4b800b1eab964a31702fa68f1ff0e955
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Cc: "Alexeitsev, D" <D.Alexeitsev@t-com.net>
X-BeenThere: sipping-tispan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of requirements for SIP introduced by ETSI TISPAN <sipping-tispan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping-tispan>, <mailto:sipping-tispan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/sipping-tispan>
List-Post: <mailto:sipping-tispan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipping-tispan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping-tispan>, <mailto:sipping-tispan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: sipping-tispan-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: sipping-tispan-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Migule,

In case CDIV, I think it's better to change REQ-CDIV-1 as followed to make it consistent with REQ-CDIV-3 and REQ-CDIV-4,
From:
It must be possible that the caller is informed that a communication is being diverted. 
To: 
It must be possible for the caller, the callee, and network intermediaries to be informed that a communication is being diverted. 
How do you think?

A short tiping error in REQ-CDIV-4, callee instead of caleee.

Regards,
Justin

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Miguel Garcia" <Miguel.An.Garcia@nokia.com>
To: <sipping-tispan@ietf.org>
Cc: "Alexeitsev, D" <D.Alexeitsev@t-com.net>
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 7:25 PM
Subject: [Sipping-tispan] Requirements -02g


> Hi:
> 
> I have this working copy of the requirements, version -02g:
> 
> http://people.nokia.net/~miguel/drafts/pre/draft-jesske-sipping-tispan-requirements-02g.txt
> http://people.nokia.net/~miguel/drafts/pre/draft-jesske-sipping-tispan-requirements-02g.html
> 
> And a diff version with respect -02f:
> 
> http://people.nokia.net/~miguel/drafts/pre/draft-jesske-sipping-tispan-requirements-02f-to-g.html
> 
> The changes in this version are:
> - Grouping of the CCBS/CCNR requirements for better understing
> - A few clarifications to the CDIV requirements
> - Addition of the Calling Party Category requirements.
> 
> Now, I have a few questions.
> 
> - The Calling Party Category requirements do not constitute a service by 
>   itself. In my opinion, they should be General requirements listed a 
> REQ-GEN-4 and REQ-GEN-5. Does anyone oppose to move them to the General 
> section?
> 
> - We had a pending action point to revisit the ACR requirements once we 
> have drafted the Calling Party Category requirements. Now we have 
> achieved this state, and my opinion is that we don't need to add any 
> extra wording to ACR, since the Calling Party Category requirements 
> cover the use case we have been discussing (police anonymously call a 
> user with ACR activated).
> 
> Last, but not least, WE ARE ALMOST DONE with the requirements. So please 
> take a look at this draft and comment on any pending issue. I would like 
> to solve issues as soon as possible and submit the draft for publication.
> 
> Regards,
> 
>          Miguel
> 
> -- 
> Miguel A. Garcia           tel:+358-50-4804586
> sip:miguel.an.garcia@openlaboratory.net
> Nokia Research Center      Helsinki, Finland
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sipping-tispan mailing list
> Sipping-tispan@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping-tispan

_______________________________________________
Sipping-tispan mailing list
Sipping-tispan@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping-tispan