Re: [Sipping-tispan] Requirements -02g

["ZhouQing(Justin)" <[e-mail]>]

Hi Miguel,

It is ok and thanks for your great efforts.

Regards,
Justin

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Miguel Garcia" <[e-mail]>
To: "ZhouQing(Justin)" <[e-mail]>
Cc: <[e-mail]>rg>; "Alexeitsev, D" <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 3:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Sipping-tispan] Requirements -02g


> Hi Justin:
> 
> I guess the easiest way is to add a new requirement between REQ-CDIV-1 
> and REQ-CDIV-2 that reads what you proposed below:
> 
> It must be possible for the callee, and network intermediaries to be 
> informed that the communication was diverted.
> 
> I will add it to my working copy.
> 
> /Miguel
> 
> 
> ZhouQing(Justin) wrote:
> 
> > Hi Miguel,
> > 
> > Thanks for your clarification.
> > 
> > As our discussion in the past, there is a requirement as followed:
> > It must be possible for the callee and network intermediaries to be informed
> > that the communication was diverted.
> > 
> > It is a new requirement and is not included in the last draft, so we need to add it.
> > 
> > I suggest to add a requirement REQ-CDIV-XX as followed::
> > It must be possible for the callee, and network intermediaries to be informed that the communication was diverted. 
> > 
> > It is similar with REQ-CDIV-1, can we combine these 2 requirements? or include it in the exist requirements, eg. REQ-CDIV-3? 
> > You have more experiences, so I think maybe you have a better way to add it.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Justin
> > 
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Miguel Garcia" <[e-mail]>
> > To: "ZhouQing(Justin)" <[e-mail]>
> > Cc: <[e-mail]>rg>; "Alexeitsev, D" <[e-mail]>
> > Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 9:26 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Sipping-tispan] Requirements -02g
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >>Hi Justin:
> >>
> >>Inline.
> >>
> >>ZhouQing(Justin) wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Hi Miguel,
> >>>
> >>>I have a holiday last week and sorry for the delay.
> >>>
> >>>Thanks for your detail, it is clear and reasonable, it makes me 
> >>>agree with you that the callee and the network intermediaries
> >>>may not have the requirements obviously to be aware that "something 
> >>>is going on right here right now". 
> >>>
> >>>As we seem, it has requirement for the network intermediaries to be 
> >>>aware that "something went on" (-3 and -4), so I think that the network 
> >>>intermediaries have the requirements to be aware that the communication 
> >>>was diverted or not, so that the network intermediaries(eg. voice mail 
> >>>server) can provide personalized services according to the communication
> >>>diverted information.
> >>>
> >>>Do you think we have the requirements for the callee and the network
> >>>intermediaries to be aware that the communication was diverted? 
> >>>Thank you. 
> >>>
> >>
> >>Yes, we discussed this in the past, and some use cases were explained...
> >> like a voicemail type of intermediary... So I think we have the
> >>requirements.
> >>
> >>/Miguel
> >>
> >>
> >>>Justin
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>----- Original Message ----- 
> >>
> >>
> >>-- 
> >>Miguel A. Garcia           tel:[phone]
> >>sip:[e-mail]
> >>Nokia Research Center      Helsinki, Finland
> >>
> 
> -- 
> Miguel A. Garcia           tel:[phone]
> sip:[e-mail]
> Nokia Research Center      Helsinki, Finland
> 

_______________________________________________
Sipping-tispan mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping-tispan