[Sipping-tispan] [ACR] Seeking consensus
Miguel Garcia <Miguel.An.Garcia@nokia.com> Thu, 01 September 2005 08:06 UTC
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32)
id 1EAk5X-0003wp-Mj; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 04:06:23 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EAk5W-0003wk-C9
for sipping-tispan@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 04:06:22 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1])
by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA03245
for <sipping-tispan@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 04:06:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mgw-ext01.nokia.com ([131.228.20.93])
by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EAk7P-0004iZ-TC
for sipping-tispan@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 04:08:21 -0400
Received: from esebh107.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh107.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.143.143])
by mgw-ext01.nokia.com (Switch-3.1.7/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id
j8186J8e015057; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 11:06:19 +0300
Received: from esebh002.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.77]) by
esebh107.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
Thu, 1 Sep 2005 11:06:13 +0300
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([172.21.35.2]) by esebh002.NOE.Nokia.com with
Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6881); Thu, 1 Sep 2005 11:06:13 +0300
Message-ID: <4316B674.8020404@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 11:06:12 +0300
From: Miguel Garcia <Miguel.An.Garcia@nokia.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, es-es
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: sipping-tispan@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Sep 2005 08:06:13.0760 (UTC)
FILETIME=[056E4000:01C5AECC]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 2409bba43e9c8d580670fda8b695204a
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "Alexeitsev, D" <D.Alexeitsev@t-com.net>
Subject: [Sipping-tispan] [ACR] Seeking consensus
X-BeenThere: sipping-tispan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of requirements for SIP introduced by ETSI TISPAN
<sipping-tispan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping-tispan>,
<mailto:sipping-tispan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/sipping-tispan>
List-Post: <mailto:sipping-tispan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipping-tispan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping-tispan>,
<mailto:sipping-tispan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: sipping-tispan-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: sipping-tispan-bounces@ietf.org
Folks. We discussed heavily the ACR service in the past, and we have now 4 requirements listed in version 02c of the draft, http://people.nokia.net/~miguel/drafts/pre/draft-jesske-sipping-tispan-requirements-02c.txt In my opinion, REQ-ACR-2 is still weak because it does not say who will categorize users. So what about to replace the current REQ-ACR-2 with: "The originating terminating network shall be able to indicate to the terminating network that the caller of an anonymous communication is authorized to bypass the ACR service at the callee's network." And then, we don't need anymore the REQ-ACR-4 that currently says: "It must be possible for the the ACR service provider to determine the callers who can bypass the ACR service of the callee." Is this acceptable? /Miguel -- Miguel A. Garcia tel:+358-50-4804586 sip:miguel.an.garcia@openlaboratory.net Nokia Research Center Helsinki, Finland _______________________________________________ Sipping-tispan mailing list Sipping-tispan@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping-tispan
- [Sipping-tispan] [ACR] Seeking consensus Miguel Garcia