[Sipping-tispan] Re: TIP/TIR requirements

Inline discussion.

Schmidt, Christian wrote:

> Some comments / questions concerning the TIP/TIR requirements:
> 
> - What happens, when the caller is in PSTN and the callee provides a SIP
> URI as identity? Will it be translated at the gateway to a E.164 number?

I don't know what people want to do in this scenario, but in my opinion 
the responsibility lies in the calee, so if the callee offers only a SIP 
URI, and not both a SIP URI and TEL URL, then the network shouldn't be 
doing this type of translations. Remember that this is not an asserted 
identity, so this should be end-to-end information

> - TIP-1: type error: calle > callee

Fixed.

> - How to handle identity restriction from PSTN/ISDN side? Sould the
> gateway delete both identity information and restriction information in
> this case?

If we build on the trust model, and if we consider that the PSTN Gateway 
trusts the IMS network, then I would say no, delete at the 
trusted/not-trusted boundary.

> EQ-TIP-4: If identity information and restriction indication is included
> in a message, the gateway may not transfer the identity information.

Is this a proposal for a new requirement? What is the actual requirement 
here? This looks like a clarification.

/Miguel
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Christian
> 

-- 
Miguel A. Garcia           tel:+358-50-4804586
sip:miguel.an.garcia@openlaboratory.net
Nokia Research Center      Helsinki, Finland

_______________________________________________
Sipping-tispan mailing list
Sipping-tispan@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping-tispan