Re: [Sipping-tispan] requirements -02f

Miguel Garcia wrote:
> Hi:
> 
> I have added one more requirement, CDIV, to our draft.

>    REQ-CDIV-1: It must be possible that the caller is informed that a
>                communication is being diverted.

I can't understand what this is requiring. The fact that it must be 
possible to inform the caller does not say that the caller will in fact 
be informed. Is the decision about whether the caller is informed to be 
made by the caller or the callee, or somebody else?

>    REQ-CDIV-2: It must be possible for the diverting user to express his
>                privacy requirements with respect his identity.

Again, just because the user expressed requirements does not endure they 
will be honored. What is the real requirement?

>    REQ-CDIV-3: The reason of the redirection must be available to both
>                the caller and callee.

Is there a clear distinction between a redirection and a simple 
forwarding? Is there a list of the possible reasons? What if none of the 
possible reasons is applicable? What if the reason for forwarding is not 
known?

>    REQ-CDIV-4: The history of the communication must be available to
>                both the caller and callee.

Are you talking about History-Info? "history of the communication" could 
mean many things, including a complete log of all the media that were 
exchanged.

	Paul

P.S. It is getting increasingly frustrating to figure out why we must 
include a buggy whip holder in the design for our new car, and what the 
car must do when whipped in various ways.

_______________________________________________
Sipping-tispan mailing list
Sipping-tispan@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping-tispan