Re: AW: [Sipping-tispan] draft-jesske-sipping-tispan-requirements-02c

[Miguel Garcia <[e-mail]>]

Hi Phil:

Yes, Christian also pointed the same. So I will remove the override 
feature and let it be implemented with the calling category requirement.

So in the next version ACR will have the two requirements as indicated 
by Christian, they look ok me.

/Miguel

Philip Mart wrote:

> Miguel,
> 
> I believe that we can just drop the override feature, there are ways of
> handling the issues that just don't need to be in the protocol
> specification.
> 
> Therefore I support the use of the description proposed by Christian. I
> note in passing that the requirment REQ-ACR-2 is actually stronger than the
> equivalent text in EN 300 798 where the presence of a note significantly
> weakens it, but it seems a perfectly reasonable and socially useful
> requirement to maintain.
> 
> Phil
> 
> 
>                                                                                                                                           
>                       Miguel Garcia                                                                                                       
>                       <Miguel.An.Garcia@no        To:       "Schmidt, Christian" <[e-mail]>                          
>                       kia.com>                    cc:       [e-mail], "Alexeitsev, D" <[e-mail]>             
>                       Sent by:                    Subject:  Re: AW: [Sipping-tispan] draft-jesske-sipping-tispan-requirements-02c         
>                       sipping-tispan-bounc                                                                                                
>                       [e-mail]                                                                                                         
>                                                                                                                                           
>                                                                                                                                           
>                       01/09/2005 10:00                                                                                                    
>                                                                                                                                           
>                                                                                                                                           
> 
> 
> 
> 
> This is ok, but can we remove the "override" feature?
> 
> /Miguel
> 
> Schmidt, Christian wrote:
> 
> 
>>Hi,
>>
>>if the override request is skipped, we can simplify the ACR requirements
> 
> to
> 
>>"This service allows a callee to instruct the network to automatically
> 
> reject
> 
>>incoming communications when the caller has requested anonymity.  The ACR
>>supplementary service is described in ETSI EN 300 798 [13].
>>
>>ACR is a regulatory service.
>>
>>REQ-ACR-1: The originating network shall be able to indicate to the
>>           terminating network, that the caller has requested anonymity.
>>
>>REQ-ACR-2: The ACR simulation service requires the caller to be
>>           informed that the communication was rejected because the
>>           SIP request was anonymous and the callee had the ACR
>>           service activated."
>>
>>What do you think about?
>>Christian
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>Von: [e-mail]
> 
> [mailto:[e-mail]] Im Auftrag von Miguel Garcia
> 
>>Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. September 2005 09:50
>>An: [e-mail]
>>Cc: Alexeitsev, D
>>Betreff: [Sipping-tispan] draft-jesske-sipping-tispan-requirements-02c
>>
>>
>>Hi:
>>
>>I have put a new working copy of the requirements draft.
>>
>>
> 
> http://people.nokia.net/~miguel/drafts/pre/draft-jesske-sipping-tispan-requirements-02c.txt
> 
> 
> http://people.nokia.net/~miguel/drafts/pre/draft-jesske-sipping-tispan-requirements-02c.html
> 
> 
>>Changes with respect the previous version.
>>
>>- ACR: added a second requirement (REQ-ACR-2) that was discussed here in
>>the list, but I kept the old REQ-ACR-2 that now becomes -3.
>>
>>- I have added CCBS/CCNR, combined into a single set of requirements.
>>
>>I will start a separate thread , per topic, on both requirements, I
>>think we need more changes. Please comment on these or any other service
>>as you wish.
>>
>>/Miguel
>>
> 
> 
> --
> Miguel A. Garcia           tel:[phone]
> sip:[e-mail]
> Nokia Research Center      Helsinki, Finland
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sipping-tispan mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping-tispan
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Miguel A. Garcia           tel:[phone]
sip:[e-mail]
Nokia Research Center      Helsinki, Finland


_______________________________________________
Sipping-tispan mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping-tispan