RE: [Sipping-tispan] Prioritization of TISPAN requirements in IETF
"Shida Schubert" <dashi@mailblocks.com> Wed, 24 August 2005 22:29 UTC
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32)
id 1E83kR-0005Tn-BN; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 18:29:31 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1E83kP-0005Te-54
for sipping-tispan@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 18:29:29 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1])
by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA26682
for <sipping-tispan@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 18:29:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtp1.mailblocks.com ([140.174.9.69])
by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E83kn-0002Xg-PO
for sipping-tispan@ietf.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 18:29:54 -0400
Received: (qmail 14869 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2005 22:29:09 -0000
Received: from 10.10.0.70 (HELO mailblocks.com) (10.10.0.70)
by 10.10.0.7 with SMTP; 24 Aug 2005 22:29:09 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
To: "'Miguel Garcia'" <Miguel.An.Garcia@nokia.com>,
"'Hans Erik van Elburg \(RY/ETM\)'" <hanserik.van.elburg@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353
Subject: RE: [Sipping-tispan] Prioritization of TISPAN requirements in IETF
X-MB-Message-Source: ClientSMTP
Received: from 24.85.247.85 by app21.mailblocks.com (192.168.225.70) with SMTP
(authenticated); Wed, 24 Aug 2005 15:29:09 -0700
X-MB-Message-Type: User
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 15:29:02 -0700
From: "Shida Schubert" <dashi@mailblocks.com>
Thread-Index: AcWopl7kYevsrGQSRHaWq1HtIs1hxgAUmhhg
In-Reply-To: <430C661E.2090601@nokia.com>
Message-Id: <dashi-0NY3oA/uQoKsPqNLhIgMt9Xca0YiVfg@mailblocks.com>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7e439b86d3292ef5adf93b694a43a576
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: sipping-tispan@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: sipping-tispan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of requirements for SIP introduced by ETSI TISPAN
<sipping-tispan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping-tispan>,
<mailto:sipping-tispan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/sipping-tispan>
List-Post: <mailto:sipping-tispan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipping-tispan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping-tispan>,
<mailto:sipping-tispan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: sipping-tispan-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: sipping-tispan-bounces@ietf.org
I agree with Miguel here, I think TISPAN should only produce one requirements draft at this stage. Although after assessing each requirement, the split might be necessary to allow for requirement which is understood to move forward, splitting the draft at this stage will only cause further confusion which will only cause delay. Regards Shida > -----Original Message----- > From: sipping-tispan-bounces@ietf.org > [mailto:sipping-tispan-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Miguel Garcia > Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 5:21 AM > To: Hans Erik van Elburg (RY/ETM) > Cc: sipping-tispan@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Sipping-tispan] Prioritization of TISPAN requirements in IETF > > Hi: > > I think it might be useful to provide a hint of which services TISPAN is > in a hurry, because without having a solution for them, there might be > regulators that might not allow the operation of NGN. So I have no > problem in marking the regulatory services. > > As for the Internet Draft, I think TISPAN should produce only one > requirements document, so I am not in favor of splitting the document in > parts at this stage. > > /Miguel > > Hans Erik van Elburg (RY/ETM) wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > In order to speed up the advancement f the TISPAN requirements in IETF > we think it would be best to prioritize the requirements. One split we think > should be uncontroversial is to split the requirements in those that are induced > by regulatory requirements and those that are not. And to prioritize the > regulatory requirements in IETF. > > > > We believe that the following TISPAN simulation services are > Regulatory: > > > > Regulatory Services > > =============== > > - Originating Identity Presentation/ Originating Identity > Presentation Restriction (OIP/OIR, 3025) > > - OIR override (, 3025) > > - Terminating Identity Presentation/ Terminating Identity > Presentation Restriction (TIP/TIR, 3026) > > - Anonymous Communication Rejection (ACR, 3029) > > - Malicious Communication Identification (MCID, 3036) > > > > > > Follows that splitting the requirements in one group of regulatory > and one group of non-regulatory leads to the following split. > > > > Proposed grouping of TISPAN-IETF simulation service requirements > > ================================================= > > > (http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-jesske-sipping-tispan- > requirements-01.txt) > > > > Regulatory Requirements: > > - [REQ-ACR-1] > > - [REQ-ACR-2] > > - [REQ-TIP-1] > > - [REQ-TIP-2] > > - [REQ-MCID-1] > > - [REQ-MCID-2] > > > > Non-Regulatory Requirements: > > - [REQ-GEN-1] > > - [REQ-CCBS-1] > > - [REQ-CCBS-2] > > - [REQ-CCBS-3] > > - [REQ-CCBS-4] > > - [REQ-CCNR-1] > > - [REQ-CCNR-2] > > - [REQ-CW-1] > > - [REQ-CW-2] > > - [REQ-CDIV-1] > > - [REQ-CDIV-2] > > - [REQ-CDIV-3] > > - [REQ-CDIV-4] > > - [REQ-CAT-1] > > - [REQ-CAT-2] > > > > Whether the grouping can best be reflected in one draft or in multiple > drafts shall be made dependent on whether advancement of the TISPAN R1 release > is held up by a requirements draft that is not fully appoved or not. > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Hans Erik van Elburg > > System Engineer > > Technology Strategies > > > > Ericsson Telecommunicatie B.V. > > Research and Development > > P.O. Box 8, 5120AA Rijen > > The Netherlands > > > > Tel. +31 161 249889, Fax. +31 161 249904 > > sip:hanserik.van.elburg@tas.uab.ericsson.se > > Email: HansErik.van.Elburg@ericsson.com, Internet: http://www.ericsson.nl > > > > This communication is confidential and intended solely for the addressee(s). > Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you > believe this message has been sent to you in error, please notify the sender > by replying to this transmission and delete the message without disclosing it. > Thank you. > > E-mail including attachments is susceptible to data corruption, interruption, > unauthorized amendment, tampering and viruses, and we only send and receive > e-mails on the basis that we are not liable for any such corruption, > interception, amendment, tampering or viruses or any consequences thereof. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Sipping-tispan mailing list > > Sipping-tispan@ietf.org > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping-tispan > > > > -- > Miguel A. Garcia tel:+358-50-4804586 > sip:miguel.an.garcia@openlaboratory.net > Nokia Research Center Helsinki, Finland > > > _______________________________________________ > Sipping-tispan mailing list > Sipping-tispan@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping-tispan > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.15/81 - Release Date: 24/08/2005 > -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.15/81 - Release Date: 24/08/2005 _______________________________________________ Sipping-tispan mailing list Sipping-tispan@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping-tispan
- [Sipping-tispan] Prioritization of TISPAN require… Hans Erik van Elburg (RY/ETM)
- Re: [Sipping-tispan] Prioritization of TISPAN req… Miguel Garcia
- RE: [Sipping-tispan] Prioritization of TISPAN req… Hans Erik van Elburg (RY/ETM)
- RE: [Sipping-tispan] Prioritization of TISPAN req… Shida Schubert
- RE: [Sipping-tispan] Prioritization of TISPAN req… Shida Schubert