Re: [Sipping-tispan] Requirements -02h

[Miguel Garcia <[e-mail]>]

Yeap, I agree. I posted also a question as for a decline should have the 
same effect. There is currently no "decline" in PSTN, although it exists 
in mobile networks, and IMHO a decline to a ccbs recall should make the 
ccbs request to be placed as suspended.

/Miguel

Michael Hammer (mhammer) wrote:

> This appears to be a consequence of the multi-terminal status union,
> meaning that some centralized entity (could be co-located with one
> terminal) would need to keep track of the call state of all the
> terminals representing that user (AoR).  If any one of those terminal is
> busy, then the caller is busy.  Only when all terminals are unbusy, then
> the caller is deemed free to participate in the call completion.
> 
> That assumes that only one human uses all the terminals.  If it is
> possible for more than one person to use those terminals, there could be
> a problem.  Picture the teenage daughter (son) yacking away while the
> father (mother) is trying to use CCBS to complete an important call.
> How one sets up the relationship from terminals to AoRs can be tricky.
> Perhaps some indication of CCBS from this terminal only would be useful.
> 
> At least that is how I am interpreting the requirements.
> 
> Mike
> 
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: [e-mail] 
>>[mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Elwell, John
>>Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 8:49 AM
>>To: Miguel Garcia; '[e-mail]'
>>Cc: Alexeitsev, D
>>Subject: RE: [Sipping-tispan] Requirements -02h
>>
>>Miguel,
>>
>>"REQ-CCBS/CCNR-15: Should the caller be busy at the time of executing
>>                     CCBS/CCNR request, the request is suspended until
>>                     its status changes (back to free status)."
>>
>>What is meant by caller busy? Is this the human user (or 
>>application)? Or the UA from which CCBS/CCNR was requested? 
>>Or all the caller's UAs? Or any of the caller's UAs? This is 
>>important as it will determine the SIP signalling needed to 
>>determine whether the caller is busy.
>>
>>John
>>
>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Miguel Garcia [mailto:[e-mail]]
>>>Sent: 30 September 2005 11:00
>>>To: '[e-mail]'
>>>Cc: Alexeitsev, D
>>>Subject: [Sipping-tispan] Requirements -02h
>>>
>>>ok, so here it goes with a new iteration:
>>>
>>>http://people.nokia.net/~miguel/drafts/pre/draft-jesske-sippin
>>>g-tispan-requirements-02h.txt
>>>http://people.nokia.net/~miguel/drafts/pre/draft-jesske-sippin
>>>g-tispan-requirements-02h.html
>>>
>>>And the diff version:
>>>http://people.nokia.net/~miguel/drafts/pre/draft-jesske-sippin
>>>g-tispan-requirements-02g-to-h.html
>>>
>>>Changes:
>>>- Clarification that we don't list every single requirement that we 
>>>have.
>>>- Calling Party Category requirements are now in the general section
>>>- New CCBS/CCNR requirements for the callee to be able to reject a 
>>>request for the service and to be able to use any given terminal.
>>>- Clear of ACR text related to the override feature.
>>>
>>>Note that I am still trying to classify my e-mail. Since 
>>
>>you all have 
>>
>>>been very active in the last few days, I wouldn't be 
>>
>>surprise to see 
>>
>>>that I have forgotten to add or modify something that has 
>>
>>been agree 
>>
>>>upon. In such case, please drop me an e-mail and I will add 
>>
>>it in the 
>>
>>>next iteration.
>>>
>>>/Miguel
>>>-- 
>>>Miguel A. Garcia           tel:[phone]
>>>sip:[e-mail]
>>>Nokia Research Center      Helsinki, Finland
>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Sipping-tispan mailing list
>>>[e-mail]
>>>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping-tispan
>>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Sipping-tispan mailing list
>>[e-mail]
>>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping-tispan
> 
> 

-- 
Miguel A. Garcia           tel:[phone]
sip:[e-mail]
Nokia Research Center      Helsinki, Finland


_______________________________________________
Sipping-tispan mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping-tispan