AW: AW: [Sipping-tispan] TISPAN requirements, first requiements

"Alexeitsev, D" <D.Alexeitsev@t-com.net> Thu, 25 August 2005 11:27 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1E8Fst-00077Y-Fh; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 07:27:03 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1E8Fss-00077T-UR for sipping-tispan@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 07:27:02 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA12872 for <sipping-tispan@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 07:27:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tcmail21.telekom.de ([217.6.95.235]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E8FtN-0008F1-Or for sipping-tispan@ietf.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 07:27:35 -0400
Received: from g9jbq.mgb01.telekom.de (g9jbq.mgb01.telekom.de [164.20.31.5]) by tcmail21.dmz.telekom.de with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 13:26:51 +0200
Received: by G9JBQ.mgb01.telekom.de with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <RML459H9>; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 13:26:51 +0200
Message-Id: <BB29DC6A362E5240AB6508E71376A3F10280B6C0@E9JDJ.mgb01.telekom.de>
From: "Alexeitsev, D" <D.Alexeitsev@t-com.net>
To: john.elwell@siemens.com, "Jesske, R" <R.Jesske@t-com.net>, pkyzivat@cisco.com
Subject: AW: AW: [Sipping-tispan] TISPAN requirements, first requiements
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 13:26:46 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: ffa9dfbbe7cc58b3fa6b8ae3e57b0aa3
Cc: sipping-tispan@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: sipping-tispan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of requirements for SIP introduced by ETSI TISPAN <sipping-tispan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping-tispan>, <mailto:sipping-tispan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/sipping-tispan>
List-Post: <mailto:sipping-tispan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipping-tispan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping-tispan>, <mailto:sipping-tispan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: sipping-tispan-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: sipping-tispan-bounces@ietf.org

Hello John

The reality is that our subscribers currently use something about 20 different UASs - Hard/Soft Phones, IADs, etc and non of them support anonymous call rejection right now. 

If we want to provide the ACR service in UAS we would have to make 20 change requests to 15 vendors, where we do not even have business relationship with most of them.

So even in the long term providing this ubiquitous service in the network is the only feasible solution to us, our subscribers and our regulator.

That is the practical reasoning. 

[JRE] Without the ACR service all requests / calls will get through to the
UAS. The UAS will decide how to handle individual requests according to
setting, rules, etc. An ACR service in the network would merely filter out
some requests before they get to the UAS. What is the benefit?

Greetings,
Denis Alexeitsev
Deutsche Telekom AG
T-Com Zentrale, TE332-5
Signalling, Gateways and Switching Systems
Am Kavalleriesand 3, D-64307,
Darmstadt, Germany 
Tel:  +49 6151 83-2130
Fax: +49 6151 83-4577
mailto:d.alexeitsev@t-com.net


_______________________________________________
Sipping-tispan mailing list
Sipping-tispan@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping-tispan