IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Sipping-tispan] Re: Feature enhancements

Miguel Garcia <Miguel.An.Garcia@nokia.com> Wed, 07 September 2005 12:34 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ECz7w-0004Rl-6x; Wed, 07 Sep 2005 08:34:08 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ECz7u-0004Rg-Do for sipping-tispan@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2005 08:34:06 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA16074 for <sipping-tispan@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Sep 2005 08:34:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mgw-ext03.nokia.com ([131.228.20.95]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ECzB4-00043b-6Q for sipping-tispan@ietf.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2005 08:37:23 -0400
Received: from esebh107.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh107.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.143.143]) by mgw-ext03.nokia.com (Switch-3.1.7/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id j87CXAwh003715; Wed, 7 Sep 2005 15:33:11 +0300
Received: from esebh003.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.82]) by esebh107.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 7 Sep 2005 15:34:02 +0300
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([172.21.35.78]) by esebh003.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6881); Wed, 7 Sep 2005 15:34:02 +0300
Message-ID: <431EDE3A.6020407@nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 15:34:02 +0300
From: Miguel Garcia <Miguel.An.Garcia@nokia.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, es-es
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: GARCIN Sebastien RD-CORE-ISS <sebastien.garcin@francetelecom.com>
Subject: Re: [Sipping-tispan] Re: Feature enhancements
References: <49E7012A614B024B80A7D175CB9A64EC0662FEFF@ftrdmel1.rd.francetelecom.fr>
In-Reply-To: <49E7012A614B024B80A7D175CB9A64EC0662FEFF@ftrdmel1.rd.francetelecom.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Sep 2005 12:34:02.0560 (UTC) FILETIME=[6DA90C00:01C5B3A8]
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mgw-ext03.nokia.com id j87CXAwh003715
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cd26b070c2577ac175cd3a6d878c6248
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Silvia.Tessa@TILA.COM, sipping-tispan@ietf.org, "Alexeitsev, D" <D.Alexeitsev@t-com.net>
X-BeenThere: sipping-tispan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of requirements for SIP introduced by ETSI TISPAN <sipping-tispan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping-tispan>, <mailto:sipping-tispan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/sipping-tispan>
List-Post: <mailto:sipping-tispan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipping-tispan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping-tispan>, <mailto:sipping-tispan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: sipping-tispan-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: sipping-tispan-bounces@ietf.org

I don't really understand what will we achieve, other than doing this 
slowly.

None has ever opposed to add or remove a requirement that was in the 
scope of TISPAN.

/Miguel

GARCIN Sebastien RD-CORE-ISS wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I also support Silvia's view. After we get the TISPAN requirement clarified and we digg into the protocol solutions we can discuss about enhancing the PSTN service (of course keeping the goal of PSTN interworking). 
> 
> sebastien
> 
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : sipping-tispan-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:sipping-tispan-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Miguel Garcia
> Envoyé : mercredi 7 septembre 2005 11:42
> À : Schmidt, Christian
> Cc : Silvia.Tessa@TILA.COM; sipping-tispan@ietf.org; Alexeitsev,D
> Objet : [Sipping-tispan] Re: Feature enhancements
> 
> I am ok with your proposal. Do we have other opinions?
> 
> It must be noted that, althought TISPAN has the mandate to provide a compatible service with the existing PSTN service, it is not forbidden to enhance the existing PSTN service.
> 
> /Miguel
> 
> Schmidt, Christian wrote:
> 
> 
>>Sylvia Tessa wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>I'm getting in trouble here : how are we supposed to proceed ? Do this
>>
>>kind of enhancements need to be written as requirements or will they 
>>come up through common sense >while dealing with the solution ?
>>
>>
>>>Personally I would write in the document only the strict TISPAN
>>
>>requirements, then, while elaborating a solution, it will get more 
>>advanced and general purpose, but what >do the other ones here say ?
>>
>>
>>
>>>Silvia
>>
>>
>>I agree with you, that we should restrict the requirements to TISPAN 
>>requirements. Nevertheless, I would propose, to include information 
>>about plausible feature enhancements in the draft. It would make 
>>clear, that these extensions have been studied, but are definitely not 
>>required for the basic services. Perhaps you can realize this in some 
>>kind of Non-Requirements. Example:
>>Non-Req-AoC: The cancelation of a CCBS request by the network must not 
>>be reported to the requestor of the service.
>>
>>What do you think about?
>>
>>Regards,
>>Christian
>>
> 
> 

-- 
Miguel A. Garcia           tel:+358-50-4804586
sip:miguel.an.garcia@openlaboratory.net
Nokia Research Center      Helsinki, Finland


_______________________________________________
Sipping-tispan mailing list
Sipping-tispan@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping-tispan

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email