Re: [Sipping] -04 version of draft-ietf-sipping-v6-transition

Francois: Thanks for eyeballing -04 and your comments below.  I
will incorporate them in auth48.

Francois Audet wrote:
> I withdraw my WGLC comments on from a while ago regarding the usage of
> double record-route. I have seen the light, and it now seems to me that
> it is 
> consistent with RFC 3608 and other drafts. 
> 
> I'm happy with the draft.
> 
> Nits:
> -----
> 
> - Section 3.1.1, 4th paragraph: Replace  "...then it must insert..."
> with "then it MUST insert".
> 
> - Section 3.1.1: It may be useful to explain why the double record-route
>   is used instead of the "muck-around-with-response" approach described
> in RFC 3261. 
[...]

Thanks,

- vijay
-- 
Vijay K. Gurbani  vkg@{lucent.com,research.bell-labs.com,acm.org}
Bell Laboratories, Lucent Technologies, Inc.
2701 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9F-546, Lisle, Illinois 60532 (USA)

_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sip@ietf.org for new developments of core SIP