IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [siprec] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-siprec-callflows-07: (with COMMENT)

Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 01 December 2016 14:57 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: siprec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: siprec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF9D21293E1; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 06:57:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O4o6TgQDBa_y; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 06:56:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua0-x22a.google.com (mail-ua0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84F7C1293F3; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 06:56:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id 12so250282115uas.2; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 06:56:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=g6GZg2XOFGF4V7z9ZT8MND7cFzh5VVCS4gpf41v2gAw=; b=bKKHrAyif/R2yfYTAbTgOGbn7Sfqkb36d6tyNSakHLELTtIsndklr8fzFqS7f96pwY /gbDhrqh71rBUKtUyfMwUoPB9dClpd74WlJI1FuwOfmJKIKf8n66ln0pQQKJvmRQC96W j6W3F2ko8KScZkWk/3/HJUoRP1ulsvoMKEal3wMVVNyqXWkX4a7k7b3iHiZ+j6q4BQwh Jk0MayHZSuErhOE/n07PpgMs504ufgdmjzBE+P2rKBGUskvkte3X8T+x12Mlqqcat4kN lIpUG0qpdqN3UsSJfK/4K8tni/bMGN+0mOhoO/maKqTkHzPJz6sLMx/co+KoPZT9geKA FUYQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=g6GZg2XOFGF4V7z9ZT8MND7cFzh5VVCS4gpf41v2gAw=; b=DbfUAD2cHHu8qJlWx7YZS72eYe/7TmRu6fnrLuHgWs31LNn1uM5m3fyUTcRk0LmkMH s2Y96X1fgb3nUSH3hrbg7EqDy17TK9GCsegmt4sHrIGcps/H5MtLVsmB3xl9zE2t+zCL Cl7ntBLLeqkyS+MmyRdXV+ZL5TkEwyuk7r0Yy+3dlcranBWePbqyaGKAnvvSqPMXwkGS IFMN2/cBkOSRNcyrQT1g4hsRnOQ/gsklqeykYiZNXr4N1ifmcaI5l1kRryfEqfc8ZY0g FPDFvEsGZ+lHTZ2GTAhZ5JsME+pSprkTRk84ZX1mbxN8TV5a0xwJifihlNt7HUnxMKoD ZGPA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC00Y1WS9/JoxyoNtxKMAXFIsvA+q/4MRJGJPxH0n9+HTuBxkVw9pe+e0X8cbIOtnC1ZzQjbnFrtXrSqH0Q==
X-Received: by 10.176.82.214 with SMTP id w22mr28767833uaw.167.1480604214585; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 06:56:54 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.176.82.232 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 06:56:54 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <F976F011-765E-43D0-AF1B-8FAC550E16ED@cisco.com>
References: <148055974335.9587.1740636611385602323.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <F976F011-765E-43D0-AF1B-8FAC550E16ED@cisco.com>
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 09:56:54 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHbuEH5R0dtCvM9vaKB8cLMmt_ty4GJq9pnhfLgW2EJWh7t3pw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)" <rmohanr@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c18fad043734a05429a0884"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/siprec/0kLvkiPBQjg33WHafOJBV2sBbB0>
Cc: "siprec@ietf.org" <siprec@ietf.org>, Andrew Hutton <andrew.hutton@unify.com>, "draft-ietf-siprec-callflows@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-siprec-callflows@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "siprec-chairs@ietf.org" <siprec-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [siprec] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-siprec-callflows-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: siprec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Recording Working Group Discussion List <siprec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/siprec>, <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/siprec/>
List-Post: <mailto:siprec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/siprec>, <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 14:57:01 -0000

Thank you!

On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Ram Mohan R (rmohanr) <rmohanr@cisco.com>
wrote:

> Hi Kathleen,
>
> I will address the secDir comments. Also will add the text “and privacy”
> to the section title.
>
> Regards,
> Ram
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kathleen Moriarty <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
> Date: Thursday, 1 December 2016 at 8:05 AM
> To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
> Cc: "draft-ietf-siprec-callflows@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-siprec-callflows@
> ietf.org>, Andrew Hutton <andrew.hutton@unify.com>, "
> siprec-chairs@ietf.org" <siprec-chairs@ietf.org>, "andrew.hutton@unify.com"
> <andrew.hutton@unify.com>, "siprec@ietf.org" <siprec@ietf.org>
> Subject: Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-siprec-callflows-07:
> (with COMMENT)
> Resent-From: <alias-bounces@ietf.org>
> Resent-To: <rmohanr@cisco.com>, <partha@parthasarathi.co.in>, <
> pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
> Resent-Date: Thursday, 1 December 2016 at 8:05 AM
>
>     Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for
>     draft-ietf-siprec-callflows-07: No Objection
>
>     When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>     email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>     introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
>     Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.
> html
>     for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
>     The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-siprec-callflows/
>
>
>
>     ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>     COMMENT:
>     ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>     I had the smae question about privacy considerations that the SecDir
>     reviewer noted:
>     https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg06953.html
>
>     But see it is covered in the referenced drafts.  As such, could you
> note
>     in the security considerations section the references are for both
>     security and privacy considerations?  Just add "and privacy".
>
>
>
>
>


-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email