Re: [siprec] AD evaluation: draft-ietf-siprec-callflows-07

"Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)" <rmohanr@cisco.com> Mon, 24 October 2016 05:22 UTC

Return-Path: <rmohanr@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: siprec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: siprec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A585F129466 for <siprec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 22:22:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.952
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.952 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.431, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MWI_a7POnPLm for <siprec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 22:22:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C073129436 for <siprec@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 22:22:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1277; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1477286545; x=1478496145; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=mtJKHAz8qg1pj3cnljIlsB6TlwT2SdcgW024uwJaX9E=; b=TmRIzxpPKRGZV6YgOrmAxSVCAIKbV6bDdKJVSHCFwDYZPzGLGCucRxYt jyh3csMMAB1p3YqaRudLy+c0mOpQ2JgIv7rIcxVfLLYSGWmpSd23Krvzv iT/3Jr9eSUKzGzYsm138+58zEjj21uoZUSsVUZpDAW8RbBK8253vZeg8p Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CSAQAOmg1Y/5hdJa1cGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBgyoBAQEBAR1YfQcBjSyWfJQ/ggccC4UwSgKBaD8UAQIBAQEBAQEBYiiEYgEBAQQBAQEkEzQXBAIBCBEDAQIfECcLHQgCBAESiFIOwhMBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGQWLEoomBZoUAZASkAKNBoQAAR42XoUCcodBAX8BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,392,1473120000"; d="scan'208";a="338543296"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Oct 2016 05:22:24 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-020.cisco.com (xch-rtp-020.cisco.com [64.101.220.160]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u9O5MOji001781 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 24 Oct 2016 05:22:24 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-017.cisco.com (64.101.220.157) by XCH-RTP-020.cisco.com (64.101.220.160) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 01:22:23 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-017.cisco.com ([64.101.220.157]) by XCH-RTP-017.cisco.com ([64.101.220.157]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 01:22:23 -0400
From: "Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)" <rmohanr@cisco.com>
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, "siprec@ietf.org" <siprec@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [siprec] AD evaluation: draft-ietf-siprec-callflows-07
Thread-Index: AQHSLbaZ3cKCdmwiU0KvEAWoFD5W+g==
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 05:22:23 +0000
Message-ID: <D4339850.6CE49%rmohanr@cisco.com>
References: <813F4CF9-C798-4DCA-9D21-C14C12C1AA9D@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <813F4CF9-C798-4DCA-9D21-C14C12C1AA9D@cooperw.in>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.8.160830
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [72.163.172.135]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <B615778BD7C4734C80A5DD3A10B95F59@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/siprec/C5SxieyCSM5Uj9lZVLXdurUYZ5U>
Subject: Re: [siprec] AD evaluation: draft-ietf-siprec-callflows-07
X-BeenThere: siprec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Recording Working Group Discussion List <siprec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/siprec>, <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/siprec/>
List-Post: <mailto:siprec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/siprec>, <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 05:22:26 -0000

Thanks Alissa. Will take care of these nits.

Regards,
Ram

-----Original Message-----
From: siprec <siprec-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Alissa Cooper
<alissa@cooperw.in>
Date: Monday, 24 October 2016 at 6:14 AM
To: "siprec@ietf.org" <siprec@ietf.org>
Subject: [siprec] AD evaluation: draft-ietf-siprec-callflows-07

>I have reviewed this draft in preparation for IETF last call. I believe
>it is ready for LC and will issue the request to start LC shortly. Below
>are some nits that should be resolved together with any last call
>comments:
>
>= Section 3 =
>
>s/sub-sections has/sub-sections have/
>
>"In all these use-cases, the SRC is a B2BUA." --> But then you go on to
>talk about examples where the SRC is a UA. I think this sentence should
>be deleted. 
>
>= Section 3.1 =
>
>The figure should have a caption.
>
>s/may be a endpoint/may be an endpoint/
>
>s/Special flows like Turret flows/Special flows like Turret flows (used
>on financial trading floors to manage call activity)./
>
>= Section 3.3.2 =
>
>s/Bob puts Alice hold/Bob puts Alice on hold/
>
>
>Thanks,
>Alissa
>_______________________________________________
>siprec mailing list
>siprec@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/siprec