IETF Logo Mail Archive

[siprec] AD evaluation: draft-ietf-siprec-callflows-07

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Mon, 24 October 2016 00:45 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: siprec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: siprec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF8A1129447 for <siprec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 17:45:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.721
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.721 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=hQUkCUY5; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=oRXAwgW0
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IQrNH7ELpI_d for <siprec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 17:45:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE765126D73 for <siprec@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 17:44:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51E3620863 for <siprec@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 20:44:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 23 Oct 2016 20:44:59 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=ElA ZgyFrgm1zxxo9A0ppChP8+go=; b=hQUkCUY5yKcnCBzk9K4ISdzjzdHJn4wK5FL JthngWJsyucFVaX8s8keP8kiC8hTamjvjo5R4ptHtmos7l7M2ap6poelEYlAL0P9 mjlEeCa6KyLhqQNuInDEkMOWhdFQ2PJxQHaIB83HpbtDwfVVN02gL4XPkHjHRZgL Dr5xgsbo=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=ElAZgyFrgm1zxxo9A0ppChP8+go=; b=oRXAw gW0jC05BmJOALtF3BIegKBOftCD4fh0mO5OP7L3CElePr88cbsnDOH3xiyTju0S9 hYtaMwD4he+jr8cpf7dHgen4nKzuhxZ2kpmo0Mgl+SDXN0VXR1u8RzKEW3hnIcM8 MkJmmQdh79oPYe2YxG7OpJeBoW4Is5NnB6V1f0=
X-Sasl-enc: 0k8EAjOBddWOEdpP+aJY1q0LqHWcOtXp2LUlbuy0ihLn 1477269898
Received: from sjc-alcoop-8813.cisco.com (unknown [128.107.241.181]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C690AF29CB for <siprec@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 20:44:58 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <813F4CF9-C798-4DCA-9D21-C14C12C1AA9D@cooperw.in>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 20:44:58 -0400
To: siprec@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/siprec/IehImNsoF30z3pOmYb5_MGFINbE>
Subject: [siprec] AD evaluation: draft-ietf-siprec-callflows-07
X-BeenThere: siprec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Recording Working Group Discussion List <siprec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/siprec>, <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/siprec/>
List-Post: <mailto:siprec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/siprec>, <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 00:45:01 -0000

I have reviewed this draft in preparation for IETF last call. I believe it is ready for LC and will issue the request to start LC shortly. Below are some nits that should be resolved together with any last call comments:

= Section 3 =

s/sub-sections has/sub-sections have/

"In all these use-cases, the SRC is a B2BUA." --> But then you go on to talk about examples where the SRC is a UA. I think this sentence should be deleted. 

= Section 3.1 =

The figure should have a caption.

s/may be a endpoint/may be an endpoint/

s/Special flows like Turret flows/Special flows like Turret flows (used on financial trading floors to manage call activity)./

= Section 3.3.2 =

s/Bob puts Alice hold/Bob puts Alice on hold/


Thanks,
Alissa

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email