Re: [siprec] secDir review of draft-ietf-siprec-metadata
"Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)" <rmohanr@cisco.com> Mon, 29 February 2016 15:18 UTC
Return-Path: <rmohanr@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: siprec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: siprec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4330F1B3363 for <siprec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 07:18:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.507
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.507 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id azRY8tAU2u1v for <siprec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 07:18:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B7791B3356 for <siprec@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 07:18:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=913; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1456759092; x=1457968692; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=Je3EScFASSGVI7uhKhRwPjKiWWvKjdox3KqJY4CrjA4=; b=XMPHoUaCLDf047scRQ6FDmYKEK/2P/Lz9RxHvw8m5M3taLqt0DQyMs1H AT5qbbaAgoloGIhK9I4lZlbQaND0yR1S6qk40zfvb8TrN7eQCc+Nnj/m4 kuFTYWW7uNTSF6fijsH8vh5kXxNBcB9Bo9LX15LQ1BphseX6MYHIJnrSK U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0D3AQB1YNRW/4cNJK1eDoMsgT8GumUBDYFnhhMCgTM4FAEBAQEBAQFkJ4RBAQEBAwGBBQQCAQgOAwMBAi8yHQgCBAESiBcIvnoBAQEBAQEBAwEBAQEBAQEZikyIbwEEjWOJKQGNYY50jkkBHgEBQoIDGYENO2qHRX4BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,521,1449532800"; d="scan'208";a="78047468"
Received: from alln-core-2.cisco.com ([173.36.13.135]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 29 Feb 2016 15:18:11 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-016.cisco.com (xch-aln-016.cisco.com [173.36.7.26]) by alln-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u1TFIBMG025166 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 29 Feb 2016 15:18:11 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-017.cisco.com (173.37.102.27) by XCH-ALN-016.cisco.com (173.36.7.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 09:18:10 -0600
Received: from xch-rcd-017.cisco.com ([173.37.102.27]) by XCH-RCD-017.cisco.com ([173.37.102.27]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 09:18:11 -0600
From: "Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)" <rmohanr@cisco.com>
To: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>, "siprec@ietf.org" <siprec@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [siprec] secDir review of draft-ietf-siprec-metadata
Thread-Index: AQHRcwRmHl7RjFI/zECnqC3naYOvkQ==
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 15:18:11 +0000
Message-ID: <D2FA60F4.52CD1%rmohanr@cisco.com>
References: <D2F6236F.5280F%rmohanr@cisco.com> <56D364AC.6050602@alum.mit.edu> <D2F9BAE5.52B37%rmohanr@cisco.com> <56D45EB5.3090908@alum.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <56D45EB5.3090908@alum.mit.edu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.1.160122
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.65.94.246]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <FBF6D838FCD7B14C811ABA1911E1BC6C@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/siprec/IyNFM1iz_OYm68eeDAX4XeWf7MQ>
Subject: Re: [siprec] secDir review of draft-ietf-siprec-metadata
X-BeenThere: siprec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Recording Working Group Discussion List <siprec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/siprec>, <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/siprec/>
List-Post: <mailto:siprec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/siprec>, <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 15:18:13 -0000
-----Original Message----- From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Date: Monday, 29 February 2016 at 8:37 PM To: Cisco Employee <rmohanr@cisco.com>, "siprec@ietf.org" <siprec@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [siprec] secDir review of draft-ietf-siprec-metadata >>> >>>I'm not sure on the best way to resolve this. It could be to simply use >>>some general words saying that the algorithm must to chosen so that the >>>probability of accidental conflict is as low as if a truly random >>>algorithm was used. >>I prefer this way other wise we are putting some restrictions on how SRC >>should generate UUID. >>Do you have some suggestions on how to word this ? > >Not beyond the above. So I will add the below text. Is this fine ? " The algorithm MUST to chosen so that the probability of accidental conflict is as low as if a truly random algorithm was used.² Ram > > Thanks, > Paul
- Re: [siprec] secDir review of draft-ietf-siprec-m… Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)
- [siprec] secDir review of draft-ietf-siprec-metad… Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)
- Re: [siprec] secDir review of draft-ietf-siprec-m… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [siprec] secDir review of draft-ietf-siprec-m… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [siprec] secDir review of draft-ietf-siprec-m… Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)
- Re: [siprec] secDir review of draft-ietf-siprec-m… Parthasarathi R