Re: [siprec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-siprec-metadata-20: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Fri, 04 March 2016 14:03 UTC
Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: siprec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: siprec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AE7F1A0140; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 06:03:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.302
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.302 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tJOmYNVPpqmi; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 06:03:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D53701A013F; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 06:03:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE44DBE4D; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 14:03:50 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u9Xi0m9qLGaw; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 14:03:50 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [134.226.36.93] (bilbo.dsg.cs.tcd.ie [134.226.36.93]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BE242BE49; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 14:03:49 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1457100230; bh=t0ch5/BNGaJSzVVqrCaZwdTdXrjL1MuzV7z5Rm7x648=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=B3rZpebbmpFv4whHOnw1xaIRhQEQSjn+BOKv7E83RMdrAn7yJnd042NfW/xHfAnq2 pufD4GOYCZvC+5n49qKOhLL4qQcynCt9kVz2TLolp6T9igUpV6Xsvbi0TkDw+0sNvU KPagJxaijf5z28morCySsgP6EznY0Mk1/0QYL4zc=
To: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <20160302110853.23213.23639.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <56D70560.2020002@alum.mit.edu> <56D70B18.4010309@cs.tcd.ie> <56D71444.70508@alum.mit.edu> <56D7188C.8060208@cs.tcd.ie> <56D72403.3000008@alum.mit.edu>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Message-ID: <56D995C5.1040007@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 14:03:49 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56D72403.3000008@alum.mit.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms000800060402020401090907"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/siprec/SrgZ0HMpMrbuKLqT3tAPidmX9NU>
Cc: draft-ietf-siprec-metadata@ietf.org, siprec@ietf.org, siprec-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [siprec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-siprec-metadata-20: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: siprec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Recording Working Group Discussion List <siprec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/siprec>, <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/siprec/>
List-Post: <mailto:siprec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/siprec>, <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 14:03:53 -0000
Just bottoming out on this... On 02/03/16 17:33, Paul Kyzivat wrote: > > > So perhaps "use 4122, sections 4.3, 4.4 or 4.5 but ensure that you don't > use anything potentially personally identifying to generate the UUIDs, > so if you follow 4.3 a name space ID generated using 4.2 or 4.5 might be > a good choice." Yep, that's fine. Cheers, S.
- [siprec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [siprec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-i… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [siprec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-i… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [siprec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-i… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [siprec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-i… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [siprec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-i… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [siprec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-i… Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)
- Re: [siprec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-i… Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)
- Re: [siprec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-i… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [siprec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-i… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [siprec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-i… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [siprec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-i… Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)
- Re: [siprec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-i… Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)
- Re: [siprec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-i… Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)
- Re: [siprec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-i… Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)
- Re: [siprec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-i… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [siprec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-i… Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)
- Re: [siprec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-i… Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)
- Re: [siprec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-i… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [siprec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-i… Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)
- Re: [siprec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-i… Paul Kyzivat