Re: [siprec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-siprec-metadata-20: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Wed, 02 March 2016 15:23 UTC
Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: siprec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: siprec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B4421A88AB for <siprec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 07:23:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.235
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uni5tEw_EszG for <siprec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 07:23:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from resqmta-ch2-05v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-05v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:37]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E80591A88C3 for <siprec@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 07:23:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from resomta-ch2-16v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.112]) by resqmta-ch2-05v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id R3Nu1s0062S2Q5R013PFaC; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 15:23:15 +0000
Received: from Paul-Kyzivats-MacBook-Pro.local ([73.218.51.154]) by resomta-ch2-16v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id R3PE1s0023KdFy1013PEq8; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 15:23:15 +0000
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <20160302110853.23213.23639.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <56D70560.2020002@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2016 10:23:12 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160302110853.23213.23639.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1456932195; bh=RvNdOM/r3lrGvHuGrMeBBpTn/OBBwvlmhkjZvl2jZRo=; h=Received:Received:Subject:To:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=DQLkdh9pFZCaXjVuOIbMW/MVEWs66mOcXCgC9Ts8MrWRnb/qYqoQXiDE9tD/tOqx8 jivt/L5AazYKiEZMKopO0lMDEzD3MX1OijMINsYH1ZcPCd1hcfyK4n8N3DtDHmQLR8 JsCZmX5ZzTOVs+KYZQLHv+0aCkJReHI1U104B+QFTKyoZrB2rhNBRie2DXur4U7VUB k3vSzdcgG62++6yFEYWVmew+s4VN0PbVJtOzaHk6+P+4R9S/y8ezZLdQ1qQ5YoPGY/ ymy+hEhj/CSBNuYR+CBU98TtY5RmoLxsuH5sox7ww54FNxLUs4NHJWajST0Wp7JBpk u7l9U8GACvb9A==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/siprec/tSkMEiZvMeoKmIW4zQ293vqT278>
Cc: draft-ietf-siprec-metadata@ietf.org, siprec@ietf.org, siprec-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [siprec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-siprec-metadata-20: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: siprec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Recording Working Group Discussion List <siprec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/siprec>, <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/siprec/>
List-Post: <mailto:siprec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/siprec>, <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2016 15:23:23 -0000
On 3/2/16 6:08 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote: > (2) 6.10: Don't you need to say to use UUID version 4 with > random numbers and to not use MAC addresses? IOW, refer to > RFC4122, Section 4.4 for how to generate UUIDs. I don't think we want to restrict to the section 4.4 algorithm. SRCs may need quite a lot of UUIDs. There is no reason to be using a random number generator for each one. And there could be cases where two SRCs that are cooperating on recording might want to algorithmically synchronize their uuid generation. For both of these cases the name-based algorithm can work well. For that to be safe it is only necessary that the namespace be unique. So I would rather not be so proscriptive about *how* the UUIDs are generated, as long as they avoid accidental collisions and collisions due to malice. Thanks, Paul
- [siprec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [siprec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-i… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [siprec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-i… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [siprec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-i… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [siprec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-i… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [siprec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-i… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [siprec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-i… Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)
- Re: [siprec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-i… Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)
- Re: [siprec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-i… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [siprec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-i… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [siprec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-i… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [siprec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-i… Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)
- Re: [siprec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-i… Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)
- Re: [siprec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-i… Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)
- Re: [siprec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-i… Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)
- Re: [siprec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-i… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [siprec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-i… Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)
- Re: [siprec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-i… Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)
- Re: [siprec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-i… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [siprec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-i… Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)
- Re: [siprec] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-i… Paul Kyzivat