IETF Logo Mail Archive

[siprec] Can an MS object span several CSs in a CSG?

"Elwell, John" <john.elwell@siemens-enterprise.com> Tue, 24 May 2011 07:36 UTC

Return-Path: <john.elwell@siemens-enterprise.com>
X-Original-To: siprec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: siprec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5965CE06D4 for <siprec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 May 2011 00:36:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.497
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.497 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.102, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VVsldX6CrMmc for <siprec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 May 2011 00:36:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail182.messagelabs.com (mail182.messagelabs.com [85.158.139.83]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 71216E06CE for <siprec@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 May 2011 00:36:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: john.elwell@siemens-enterprise.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-12.tower-182.messagelabs.com!1306222582!7609505!1
X-StarScan-Version: 6.2.17; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [62.134.46.9]
Received: (qmail 25299 invoked from network); 24 May 2011 07:36:22 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO senmx11-mx) (62.134.46.9) by server-12.tower-182.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 24 May 2011 07:36:22 -0000
Received: from MCHP063A.global-ad.net (unknown [172.29.37.61]) by senmx11-mx (Server) with ESMTP id 315131EB83D3 for <siprec@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 May 2011 09:36:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from MCHP058A.global-ad.net ([172.29.37.55]) by MCHP063A.global-ad.net ([172.29.37.61]) with mapi; Tue, 24 May 2011 09:36:22 +0200
From: "Elwell, John" <john.elwell@siemens-enterprise.com>
To: "siprec@ietf.org" <siprec@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 09:36:21 +0200
Thread-Topic: Can an MS object span several CSs in a CSG?
Thread-Index: AcwZ5UbR730mQiXZRGSqd4Xx2cnzHg==
Message-ID: <A444A0F8084434499206E78C106220CA089BE68795@MCHP058A.global-ad.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [siprec] Can an MS object span several CSs in a CSG?
X-BeenThere: siprec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Recording Working Group Discussion List <siprec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/siprec>, <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/siprec>
List-Post: <mailto:siprec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/siprec>, <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 07:36:24 -0000

We seem to have consensus that a Media Stream object represents a recorded media stream, contributed to by one, several or all Participants. However, Partha also wrote:

"2) Each MS lifetime related to CSG because participant may move from one
CS to another CS within single CSG and also CSG will span across
multiple RS."

I am not sure we had resolved this during earlier discussions on the scope of an MS object. Although the same Participant can participate in several CSs within the same CSG, I don't think the recorded media streams need to be considered the same. Any other views?

John (as individual)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email