[sixpac] FW: New Version Notification for draft-veikkolainen-sip-xmpp-coex-reqs-02

<Simo.Veikkolainen@nokia.com> Wed, 26 January 2011 20:17 UTC

Return-Path: <Simo.Veikkolainen@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: sixpac@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sixpac@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBE493A69A2 for <sixpac@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 12:17:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.914
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.914 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.542, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1=0.227]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 55RY-8voX1o2 for <sixpac@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 12:17:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mgw-da01.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [147.243.128.24]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3B1D3A6944 for <sixpac@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 12:17:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vaebh101.NOE.Nokia.com (vaebh101.europe.nokia.com [10.160.244.22]) by mgw-da01.nokia.com (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id p0QKKRQ9004664 for <sixpac@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 22:20:37 +0200
Received: from smtp.mgd.nokia.com ([65.54.30.5]) by vaebh101.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 26 Jan 2011 22:20:28 +0200
Received: from 008-AM1MMR1-005.mgdnok.nokia.com (65.54.30.60) by NOK-am1MHUB-01.mgdnok.nokia.com (65.54.30.5) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.255.0; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 21:20:27 +0100
Received: from 008-AM1MPN1-003.mgdnok.nokia.com ([169.254.3.158]) by 008-AM1MMR1-005.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.60]) with mapi; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 21:20:20 +0100
From: <Simo.Veikkolainen@nokia.com>
To: <sixpac@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: New Version Notification for draft-veikkolainen-sip-xmpp-coex-reqs-02
Thread-Index: AQHLvZTBMsVG7EQwQ06Q+aXi3KtO9ZPjrp/w
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 20:20:19 +0000
Message-ID: <F9E2FDAF48D4544F874A56A3A8BD68B13BC79A@008-AM1MPN1-003.mgdnok.nokia.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jan 2011 20:20:28.0469 (UTC) FILETIME=[791A1E50:01CBBD96]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Subject: [sixpac] FW: New Version Notification for draft-veikkolainen-sip-xmpp-coex-reqs-02
X-BeenThere: sixpac@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The SIXPAC \(SIP Interworking with XMPP in Presence Aware Clients\) list is dedicated to discussion of dual-stack SIP/XMPP user agents." <sixpac.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sixpac>, <mailto:sixpac-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sixpac>
List-Post: <mailto:sixpac@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sixpac-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sixpac>, <mailto:sixpac-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 20:17:37 -0000

You're right, we should get some discussion going on.

I have just uploaded a new version of draft-veikkolainen-sip-xmpp-coex-reqs, which can be found at http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-veikkolainen-sip-xmpp-coex-reqs-02.txt 

The changes in this version address the comments made by Peter Musgrave (mainly clarifications):

In REQ-1: “SIP contact” changed to “SIP address”

In REQ-3: "It must be possible to include SIP real-time media related contact and status in XMPP presence information." changed to "It must be possible to include SIP address and status information in XMPP presence."

And a couple of typos.

One further comment made by Peter might merit a bit more discussion, namely saying something about cases where two SIP devices are registered to the same AOR and two XMPP clients are logged in. This is related to the discussion we had an correlation, and whether or not it should be mentioned in the charter or not. 

Opinions on this would be helpful.

Also, please take a fresh look at the draft and express your opinions on whether the approach in general makes sense, do you agree with the use cases and requirements, is something missing etc.

Thanks
Simo

 
-----Original Message-----
From: ext IETF I-D Submission Tool [mailto:idsubmission@ietf.org] 
Sent: 26 January, 2011 22:05
To: Veikkolainen Simo (Nokia-MS/Helsinki)
Cc: Isomaki Markus (Nokia-CIC/Espoo)
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-veikkolainen-sip-xmpp-coex-reqs-02 


A new version of I-D, draft-veikkolainen-sip-xmpp-coex-reqs-02.txt has been successfully submitted by Simo Veikkolainen and posted to the IETF repository.

Filename:	 draft-veikkolainen-sip-xmpp-coex-reqs
Revision:	 02
Title:		 Requirements and Use Cases for Combining SIP Based Real-time Media Sessions With XMPP Based Instant Messaging and Presence Service.
Creation_date:	 2011-01-26
WG ID:		 Independent Submission
Number_of_pages: 8

Abstract:
This memo defines use cases and requirements for combining Session
Initiation Protocol (SIP) based real-time media sessions with
Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP) based instant
messaging and presence services in a seamless manner.
                                                                                  


The IETF Secretariat.