[Slim] Negotiation issue in draft-ietf-slim-negotiating-human-language

Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com> Thu, 15 February 2018 12:53 UTC

Return-Path: <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: slim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: slim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF6091273B1 for <slim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 04:53:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a5oG_BoBL50U for <slim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 04:53:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vk0-x233.google.com (mail-vk0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16CE5126CBF for <slim@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 04:53:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vk0-x233.google.com with SMTP id k196so1606942vke.4 for <slim@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 04:53:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=GnmAUVnM6XLRqfS/jjmi9rOj26Lccmpypj3yXMjiocQ=; b=Y4DJGNOs3HGehUatnoRo3NVu3gtLG4Lu/CT838UriTkN2E6ic0quNtE4Qlijo8b2s8 RO2FWbKm9w/i/3GfjrSSFkh81c9OEz6bdL+gfY95vRkdin4svVCht+WGEsyFwOxqyB7D /JC+74aHiQlJF+7GjjRVbzwH0LIV0PQbitMFg0ajC1ce8YROhXt6P211goo+C5eGw+R1 ePJixSJLQGBK20m6jICC9ZijqLKyioD/1XEdITtH7wpHDpK3PCA9ZBL+qQBJsNP5hf/T X9h8gvk3W3FBynS6AJfwFwRznlfnCh2H1SZoPD/GN9kzdTygIaYTJZIgZJsnosk9704a Byrg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=GnmAUVnM6XLRqfS/jjmi9rOj26Lccmpypj3yXMjiocQ=; b=HYquhRACNMuY8VT2rHo5gji8+EjbiSj/ibL91+vk5+W24t1BIPEaLuI1D1hUkfOCPH lt68L3Ocy/9wT6KYqxISfduCAwPutIW/ii2wRQLpzjd+ZxTY5saGJ4eVo8BLZ98fDaVF abZklH19hgYM22fPowq+nksQiv/3zio+2Sn3xOKplWJ35ViCqUoT+5ncc3TVlxKphmqG aNq9XWaqSaKUNqLNWXqghmMS8G3s9TuuoSOb9Kii0mOUn3S4vPW3YaBgpa62cvfx9dvK euuK8npdwQ/yvUPyTrvcAL37OMTeRSYTGB4j+7R0cJq66SHj51thuMWm0bLdRJJflX61 I0+w==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPAT/pMUEJ6l4DJxzj6H9r0n+K3FAmZziUr/glYfWaB44+J92KYg CUxBFgiFiEOdlCzITwIuYg8on5hc3gQbMnqvKSRAfErE
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x2261V0Ht0ueacSS5HyuI1b2qitFqhlCEYU63gekzBGpL6hSovrcsisCz9n6el4vX/u2glJ2KTmStzoTEEGxOw2w=
X-Received: by 10.31.125.205 with SMTP id y196mr589749vkc.57.1518699230465; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 04:53:50 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.176.92.200 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 04:53:30 -0800 (PST)
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 07:53:30 -0500
Message-ID: <CAOW+2dtV5EaL_xTLSJNSiNjUZp-ZzFa2cMPUvSb65FRyYSNB1Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: slim@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c1494962712d205653fb8f4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/slim/5H0P-OoHdPC2WyUh93QzJBT4njw>
Subject: [Slim] Negotiation issue in draft-ietf-slim-negotiating-human-language
X-BeenThere: slim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Selection of Language for Internet Media <slim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/slim>, <mailto:slim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/slim/>
List-Post: <mailto:slim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:slim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/slim>, <mailto:slim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 12:53:54 -0000

As noted in the below thread, multiple ambiguities need to be resolved in
draft-ietf-slim-negotiating-human-language:
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/slim/current/msg01300.html

In the SDP codec negotiation, multiple codecs are offered, and the answerer
selects among them, with the first codec being the preferred one.  Codecs
not present in the Offer cannot be included in the Answer.

The model proposed in draft-ietf-slim-negotiating-human-language does not
conform to this paradigm, allowing languages not present in the Offer to be
presented in the Answer, and also (previously) having an ambiguity about
whether a single language or multiple languages can be included in an
Answer.

Gunnar has proposed language to address this.  Any reason not to accept his
proposal?