Re: [Slim] Human-language Issue 26: Asterisk modifier scope
Gunnar Hellström <gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se> Tue, 01 August 2017 21:46 UTC
Return-Path: <gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se>
X-Original-To: slim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: slim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD69E131CA0 for <slim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 14:46:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TBK5JaNzXJGg for <slim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 14:46:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bin-vsp-out-02.atm.binero.net (vsp-unauthed02.binero.net [195.74.38.227]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E69EF129B40 for <slim@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 14:46:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Halon-ID: d3369d22-7702-11e7-ba9e-005056917f90
Authorized-sender: gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se
Received: from [192.168.43.70] (unknown [2.71.228.111]) by bin-vsp-out-02.atm.binero.net (Halon) with ESMTPSA id d3369d22-7702-11e7-ba9e-005056917f90; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 23:46:08 +0200 (CEST)
To: Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org>, Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
References: <CAOW+2dv0dM+h4OG=iiE+PXakS88=tUj9YzqVB03R93P=FR-upA@mail.gmail.com> <b5f308dc-0a38-0d0c-c5c1-a3c079ee3d94@omnitor.se> <d0d6b3ed-4a6d-a16f-0f7c-42afec619ef5@alum.mit.edu> <CAOW+2duaNtCu0_rCOrBKriWz6eyoKWu3OkQWRmOCHFg39aG7+A@mail.gmail.com> <518f72c7-da4f-120e-f77f-cd61719410f3@alum.mit.edu> <7f6b44ad-8b90-0c21-b841-763be03c32af@omnitor.se> <p06240604d59e9107f51c@99.111.97.136> <5f73c02c-801e-bf33-c41d-1809dd9dc25b@comcast.net> <CAOW+2duxE9-zGoczKmTR8opwcohVdO1Ma-bXPyJE44s56Vg_yw@mail.gmail.com> <p06240600d59ec392cdbd@99.111.97.136> <CAOW+2dvm5UvBL9kg=9pey7LQz13yO0q0ibDG3UCScfw9Dmm6mg@mail.gmail.com> <p06240605d59ed132ff34@[99.111.97.136]>
Cc: slim@ietf.org, Paul Kyzivat <paul.kyzivat@comcast.net>
From: Gunnar Hellström <gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se>
Message-ID: <71dcb50e-6d36-1445-6cc5-6b91f001bc50@omnitor.se>
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2017 23:46:08 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <p06240605d59ed132ff34@[99.111.97.136]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/slim/5_l_238ezfzzbg5mNw4bIUd5_KI>
Subject: Re: [Slim] Human-language Issue 26: Asterisk modifier scope
X-BeenThere: slim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Selection of Language for Internet Media <slim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/slim>, <mailto:slim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/slim/>
List-Post: <mailto:slim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:slim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/slim>, <mailto:slim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2017 21:46:21 -0000
Den 2017-07-27 kl. 01:11, skrev Randall Gellens: > At 3:20 PM -0700 7/26/17, Bernard Aboba wrote: > >> Randy said: >> >> "Therefore, if the asterisk is causing heartburn, we can remove it >> without technical impact." >> >> [BA] Unless there is some compelling reason to keep it, removing the >> "*" might be the simplest way to resolve Issue 26. > > There is no compelling reason to keep it, especially since it's purely > advisory. > > I suggest we delete it, revise the draft, and advance it. In my view, > we've spent far too much time on the asterisk, which is a supremely > trivial aspect of the draft. > > --Randy +1 Gunnar > >> >> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 3:12 PM, Randall Gellens >> <<mailto:rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org>rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org> wrote: >> >> At 2:35 PM -0700 7/26/17, Bernard Aboba wrote: >> >> Paul said: >> >> "Then what is the expectation regarding whether to accept a call >> with no matching language?" >> >> I guess it would make the most sense for the callee to accept the >> call unless he doesn't want a call without matching language. Then if >> the callee does accept the call without the matching language the >> caller can still terminate the call once he realizes that is the >> situation. >> >> That seems reasonable to me." >> >> [BA] The inability to negotiate a matching language is different >> from other SDP negotiation failures such as the inability to >> negotiate a matching codec, since even without a matching language, >> it still may be useful to successfully negotiate media >> characteristics and bring up the call. Therefore it is not clear to >> me how much value the "*" has in the current draft, regardless of how >> it is defined. >> >> For example, if the callee has policy that dictates that it will >> always accept the call (e.g. a PSAP), the callee might always ignore >> the "*". This might be frustrating to the caller, but the caller may >> still choose not to terminate the call. >> >> Even if the callee cares deeply about a matching language (e.g. a >> voice recognition or chat bot system that is only supports a subset >> of languages), the callee might still choose to ignore the "*". >> >> For example, the callee might accept the call in order to provide >> information to the caller (e.g. a pre-recorded voice or text message >> indicating that the caller's languages are not supported). >> >> >> The draft has said for some time that the asterisk is nothing more >> than advisory, and has explicitly said that the callee is free to >> ignore either the presence or absence of an asterisk: >> >> The called party MAY ignore the indication, e.g., for the emergency >> services use case, regardless of the absence of an asterisk, a PSAP >> will likely not fail the call; some call centers might reject a call >> even if the offer contains an asterisk. >> >> Therefore, if the asterisk is causing heartburn, we can remove it >> without technical impact. >> >> --Randy >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Paul Kyzivat >> <<mailto:<mailto:paul.kyzivat@comcast.net>paul.kyzivat@comcast.net><mailto:paul.kyzivat@comcast.net>paul.kyzivat@comcast.net> >> wrote: >> >> On 7/26/17 2:35 PM, Randall Gellens wrote: >> >> Why don't we just take out of the current draft the asterisk and >> the ability to indicate a caller preference to not fail the call? >> Then Gunnar's draft(s) are free to use the asterisk. >> >> >> Then what is the expectation regarding whether to accept a call >> with no matching language? >> >> I guess it would make the most sense for the callee to accept the >> call unless he doesn't want a call without matching language. Then if >> the callee does accept the call without the matching language the >> caller can still terminate the call once he realizes that is the >> situation. >> >> That seems reasonable to me. >> >> Thanks, >> Paul >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SLIM mailing list >> >> <mailto:<mailto:SLIM@ietf.org>SLIM@ietf.org><mailto:SLIM@ietf.org>SLIM@ietf.org >> >> >> >> <<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/slim>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/slim><https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/slim>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/slim >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SLIM mailing list >> <mailto:SLIM@ietf.org>SLIM@ietf.org >> >> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/slim>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/slim >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Randall Gellens >> Opinions are personal; facts are suspect; I speak for myself only >> -------------- Randomly selected tag: --------------- >> It isn't pollution that's harming the environment. It's the >> impurities in our air and water that are doing it. >> --Dan Quayle (then-U.S. Vice-President) >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SLIM mailing list >> SLIM@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/slim > > -- ----------------------------------------- Gunnar Hellström Omnitor gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se +46 708 204 288
- [Slim] Human-language Issue 26: Asterisk modifier… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Slim] Human-language Issue 26: Asterisk modi… Gunnar Hellström
- Re: [Slim] Human-language Issue 26: Asterisk modi… Randall Gellens
- Re: [Slim] Human-language Issue 26: Asterisk modi… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Slim] Human-language Issue 26: Asterisk modi… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Slim] Human-language Issue 26: Asterisk modi… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Slim] Human-language Issue 26: Asterisk modi… Gunnar Hellström
- Re: [Slim] Human-language Issue 26: Asterisk modi… Randall Gellens
- Re: [Slim] Human-language Issue 26: Asterisk modi… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Slim] Human-language Issue 26: Asterisk modi… Brian Rosen
- Re: [Slim] Human-language Issue 26: Asterisk modi… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Slim] Human-language Issue 26: Asterisk modi… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Slim] Human-language Issue 26: Asterisk modi… Randall Gellens
- Re: [Slim] Human-language Issue 26: Asterisk modi… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Slim] Human-language Issue 26: Asterisk modi… Randall Gellens
- Re: [Slim] Human-language Issue 26: Asterisk modi… Gunnar Hellström
- Re: [Slim] Human-language Issue 26: Asterisk modi… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Slim] Human-language Issue 26: Asterisk modi… Randall Gellens