[Slim] Is the use of spoken/written language tag appropriate in draft-ietf-negotiating-human-language
Gunnar Hellström <gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se> Fri, 28 July 2017 12:24 UTC
Return-Path: <gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se>
X-Original-To: slim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: slim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C17FB132004 for <slim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 05:24:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IE3pUS1VrDJq for <slim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 05:24:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bin-vsp-out-03.atm.binero.net (vsp-unauthed02.binero.net [195.74.38.227]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 659FD132129 for <slim@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 05:24:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Halon-ID: afa5bfa4-738f-11e7-8607-0050569116f7
Authorized-sender: gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se
Received: from [172.20.7.164] (unknown [65.216.242.51]) by bin-vsp-out-03.atm.binero.net (Halon) with ESMTPSA id afa5bfa4-738f-11e7-8607-0050569116f7; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 14:24:24 +0200 (CEST)
To: "slim@ietf.org" <slim@ietf.org>, "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>
From: Gunnar Hellström <gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se>
Message-ID: <82c9d45e-9a00-3ecd-e8ba-7f48ffaa9e1b@omnitor.se>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 14:24:28 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/slim/AF3gJKUh34783hDKQI0XCafvN6Q>
Subject: [Slim] Is the use of spoken/written language tag appropriate in draft-ietf-negotiating-human-language
X-BeenThere: slim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Selection of Language for Internet Media <slim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/slim>, <mailto:slim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/slim/>
List-Post: <mailto:slim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:slim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/slim>, <mailto:slim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 12:24:51 -0000
We got a comment from Addison Phillips that use of the term "spoken/written language tag" would not be appropriate to use. It was reworded at the place where it was used. Later, the same wording reappeared in section 5.4: "the behavior when specifying a spoken/ written language tag for a video media stream" This use of the term may also be inappropriate and should be reworded. I have not understood the reasoning why it was inappropriate in the first case, so I cannot judge. /Gunnar -- ----------------------------------------- Gunnar Hellström Omnitor gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se
- [Slim] Is the use of spoken/written language tag … Gunnar Hellström
- Re: [Slim] Is the use of spoken/written language … Gunnar Hellström