Re: [Slim] Sign language in the text stream is a valid combination for real-time communication
Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org> Thu, 29 June 2017 02:19 UTC
Return-Path: <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org>
X-Original-To: slim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: slim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23CB1126C2F for <slim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 19:19:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Quarantine-ID: <rr6yR634ufjd>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "MIME-Version"
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rr6yR634ufjd for <slim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 19:19:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from turing.pensive.org (turing.pensive.org [99.111.97.161]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3980A1201F2 for <slim@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 19:19:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [99.111.97.136] (99.111.97.161) by turing.pensive.org with ESMTP (EIMS X 3.3.9); Wed, 28 Jun 2017 19:21:59 -0700
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p06240610d57a134f029b@[99.111.97.136]>
In-Reply-To: <01926268-3210-d48e-66a0-fd34b81edb30@omnitor.se>
References: <01926268-3210-d48e-66a0-fd34b81edb30@omnitor.se>
X-Mailer: Eudora for Mac OS X
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 19:18:55 -0700
To: Gunnar Hellström <gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se>, "slim@ietf.org" <slim@ietf.org>, Steve Slevinski <slevinski@signwriting.org>
From: Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/slim/B4sre33K252hKAHyH9yzkJoruDU>
Subject: Re: [Slim] Sign language in the text stream is a valid combination for real-time communication
X-BeenThere: slim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Selection of Language for Internet Media <slim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/slim>, <mailto:slim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/slim/>
List-Post: <mailto:slim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:slim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/slim>, <mailto:slim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 02:19:09 -0000
At 9:05 PM +0200 6/28/17, Gunnar Hellström wrote: > I just got aware of work with specifying sign language in text media. > > It was by recent announcement of a new draft about Signwriting. > > > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-slevinski-formal-signwriting/>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-slevinski-formal-signwriting/ > > I suggest that we let this cause a slight > change in > draft-ietf-slim-negotiating-human-language > > I am copying to the author, Steve Slevinski. > > We discussed earlier the unusual combinations > of language and media. I told about Signwriting > and other script systems for sign language in > the text stream. > Signwriting in text can be explicitly indicated > by combining a language subtag for the intended > sign language with the script subtag for > Signwriting -sgnw ( thus for example ase-sgnw > for American sign language written in text with > the Signwriting script). In certain use the > -sgnw may also be assumed and therefore omitted. > > It is not at all common to use Signwriting in > real-time conversational mode, but I think it > is not good that we exclude it by a statement > in section 5.4 > > In section 5.4, we say that sign language in > written mode is undefined. With background from > what I just found, I suggest that we at least > allow it to be defined. We may also explain how > sign language can be used in the text stream. > > Therefore, I suggest this minimal change: > ---------------------------old text 1 in > 5.4------------------------------------- > the behavior when specifying a spoken/written > language tag for a video media stream, or a > signed language tag for an audio or text media > stream, is not defined. > --------------------------new text--------------------------------- > > the behavior when specifying a spoken/written > language tag for a video media stream, or a > signed language tag for an audio media stream, > is not defined. > --------------------------end of change 1------------------------------------ > > --------------------possible change 2 in 5.2---------------------------- > --------------new paragraph three from end of > 5.2-------------------------------- > Sign language in the text stream may occur, > e.g. by use of an IANA registered script for > notation of sign language. > Example: ase-sgnw for American Sign Language written with Signwriting script. > ---------------end of new paragraph in > 5.2------------------------------------ The draft currently says it is undefined. This is not the same as prohibited. A future draft can extend this one by specifying how it is used. I think it's better to keep this draft as simple as possible, so if we don't expect this to be used, let's not add text about it. If it does seem useful in the future, it can be added with minimal fuss. -- Randall Gellens Opinions are personal; facts are suspect; I speak for myself only -------------- Randomly selected tag: --------------- Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it's the only thing that ever has. --Margaret Meed
- [Slim] Sign language in the text stream is a vali… Gunnar Hellström
- Re: [Slim] Sign language in the text stream is a … Randall Gellens
- Re: [Slim] Sign language in the text stream is a … Gunnar Hellström
- Re: [Slim] Sign language in the text stream is a … Randall Gellens