IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Slim] Proposed 5.4 text

Gunnar Hellström <gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se> Tue, 05 December 2017 22:29 UTC

Return-Path: <gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se>
X-Original-To: slim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: slim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F74D1277BB for <slim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 14:29:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QsidRXdklmqP for <slim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 14:29:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bin-vsp-out-01.atm.binero.net (bin-mail-out-06.binero.net [195.74.38.229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3B90126B6D for <slim@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 14:29:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Halon-ID: befd81f1-da0b-11e7-aafb-005056917a89
Authorized-sender: gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se
Received: from [192.168.2.136] (unknown [83.209.159.245]) by bin-vsp-out-01.atm.binero.net (Halon) with ESMTPSA id befd81f1-da0b-11e7-aafb-005056917a89; Tue, 05 Dec 2017 23:29:24 +0100 (CET)
To: slim@ietf.org
References: <55f2b336-3f14-f49a-ec78-f00b0373db00@omnitor.se> <CAOW+2dsZtuciPiKMfif=ZmUqBcUd9TyYtL5gPYDp7ZfLOHHDBA@mail.gmail.com> <p06240600d637c6f98ecc@99.111.97.136> <CAOW+2dv5NSiCbW=p1exvPV=PF8YCVdiz2gi-OCxmaUB-jGe22w@mail.gmail.com> <p06240600d6389cd2043f@99.111.97.136> <97d9a6b8-de3b-9f79-483b-18376fcf0ced@omnitor.se> <CAOW+2dtpRoeYkMJzX9vyNUojJDax4DQUU2F4PauBwt1sm-83Hg@mail.gmail.com> <6812d89a-ba10-0947-5320-07374b8c071d@comcast.net> <CAOW+2dtodRVOyGg_Q83TCPXwL3jBccA-hpBhYfrPCAUjSm5zkQ@mail.gmail.com> <E83689D8-DF61-4A3A-A5B2-8B3C05AFFB1E@brianrosen.net> <p06240607d63a5312bbbe@99.111.97.136> <72f7975c-91f5-91c2-6d8c-4f66aec63cf9@omnitor.se> <p06240609d63a644ec5b6@99.111.97.136> <CAOW+2dsP3EB8OogBU4NO917isBsOWs3VWbXK-AG88XhK7ROu4A@mail.gmail.com> <85024248-d22d-6379-6194-fdb17c4c913a@ntlworld.com> <93ec6be8-1ced-e6da-3693-6cf66069c50c@omnitor.se> <p0624060dd64ca3a860c9@[99.111.97.136]>
From: Gunnar Hellström <gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se>
Message-ID: <920ae4bc-0c0b-d571-4b9b-bdc2b08bba4b@omnitor.se>
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2017 23:29:44 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <p0624060dd64ca3a860c9@[99.111.97.136]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/slim/F9J7tQaj_pl-QpgvEbyLi1lG5s8>
Subject: Re: [Slim] Proposed 5.4 text
X-BeenThere: slim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Selection of Language for Internet Media <slim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/slim>, <mailto:slim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/slim/>
List-Post: <mailto:slim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:slim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/slim>, <mailto:slim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2017 22:29:53 -0000

Den 2017-12-05 kl. 20:27, skrev Randall Gellens:
> The argument over the use of "non-" is pointless and a waste of time. 
> We should not keep reopening it.  The draft clear and unambiguous.
I tend to agree.
I provided four alternatives in order to try to reach consensus:

1. Leave "non-sign" as is.

2. Replace "non-sign language" with "non-sign-language".

3. Replace "non-sign" with "non-signed"

4. Replace "non-sign language tag" with "language tag for a language 
that is not signed"

I can accept any of these, but have myself a slight preference for #3, 
"non-signed".

Now, since Randall still prefers #1, I suggest that we close the issue 
with the conclusion that we keep it as it is in -19.

Regards

Gunnar




-- 
-----------------------------------------
Gunnar Hellström
Omnitor
gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se
+46 708 204 288

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email