Re: [Slim] IETF last call for draft-ietf-slim-negotiating-human-language (Issue 8, section 6, IANA registrations)

[Gunnar Hellström <[e-mail]>]

More info below.


Den 2017-02-15 kl. 13:32, skrev Gunnar Hellström:
> in issue 8, I propose:
>
> (Look in the edited draft -06g that I attached some days ago for how 
> the proposal appears in the text )
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
>
>
> 8. Include more fields for attribute registration from 4566bis
>
> Section 6 has the form for attribute registration by IANA. There are a 
> couple of fields missing that will be important for use of the 
> specification in the WebRTC environment.  Include these fields if that 
> is allowable according to current IANA procedures and if that does not 
> delay the publication of this draft. These fields are needed for use 
> of text media in WebRTC.
>
> Change:
>
> In two locations from:
>     "Usage Level:  media"
>
> to:
>
>     "Usage Level:  media, dcsa(subprotocol)"
>
> Insert in two locations in the registration forms:
> "Mux Category: NORMAL"
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>
>
> I checked in current IANA registrations, and found that all SDP 
> attribute registrations now include the "Mux Category".
>
> So, I assume that we are obliged to do so also and hope that we can 
> agree on that.
> As far as I understand the logic, we should specify NORMAL.
>
> I saw no trace yet of registrations of  "Usage Level: dcsa(subprotocol)"
>
> I would like to get advice from someone with insight in the SDP 
> attribute registration and the status of the dsca(subprotocol) value 
> on how we should proceed in order to get the dsca(subprotocol)  
> included in a smooth way without causing exessive delay.
I found in 
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg-11#section-8.3 
that the registration of dcsa(subprotocol)  seems to require a specific 
actual subprotocol. That is further away in time, and if that conclusion 
is right, we need to include MUX Category but exclude "Usage Level: 
dcsa(subprotocol)"  from the registration.
>
>
> Regards
> Gunnar
>
> _______________________________________________
> SLIM mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/slim

-- 
-----------------------------------------
Gunnar Hellström
Omnitor
[e-mail]
[phone]