[Slim] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-slim-negotiating-human-language-19: (with COMMENT)
Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Mon, 08 January 2018 13:04 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: slim@ietf.org
Delivered-To: slim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D58621242F5; Mon, 8 Jan 2018 05:04:06 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-slim-negotiating-human-language@ietf.org, slim-chairs@ietf.org, bernard.aboba@gmail.com, slim@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.68.2
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <151541664682.11364.3894010973109439182.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2018 05:04:06 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/slim/tnhO3jLr16B6CI7v9IQcD3FjVVM>
Subject: [Slim] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-slim-negotiating-human-language-19: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: slim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Selection of Language for Internet Media <slim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/slim>, <mailto:slim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/slim/>
List-Post: <mailto:slim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:slim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/slim>, <mailto:slim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2018 13:04:07 -0000
Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-slim-negotiating-human-language-19: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-slim-negotiating-human-language/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- One question: I can't really imagine cases where the send and recv would be used to indicate different things. Can you provide an example (and better explain in the document why this 'complexity' was added)? One purely editorial note: I think section 5.1 could simply be removed before final publication as part of the reasoning is given in the intro already.
- [Slim] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ie… Mirja Kühlewind
- Re: [Slim] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draf… Gunnar Hellström
- Re: [Slim] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draf… Randall Gellens