IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Slim] Action or not on multiple values in an answer

Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org> Fri, 12 January 2018 19:51 UTC

Return-Path: <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org>
X-Original-To: slim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: slim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B60D312D87E for <slim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 11:51:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Quarantine-ID: <CxanAjJf_emo>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "MIME-Version"
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CxanAjJf_emo for <slim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 11:51:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from turing.pensive.org (turing.pensive.org [99.111.97.161]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BD1612D87B for <slim@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 11:51:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [99.111.97.136] (99.111.97.161) by turing.pensive.org with ESMTP (EIMS X 3.3.9); Fri, 12 Jan 2018 11:52:15 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p06240602d67ec1cc59c1@[99.111.97.136]>
In-Reply-To: <CAOW+2ds2jf+t9fAJ7wHs=mCZjhapU_f4wNoHTNyn7ABZVc-cTg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <151555808122.21584.8379796998643581181.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <p06240602d67be148b9db@99.111.97.136> <2c49d430-3fb1-381f-d236-4bc5a6a38c27@omnitor.se> <CAOW+2dtDBKR5q_LO9=kTpgKQJR=P_hy4yzQC=iy8q_WgtH6hyw@mail.gmail.com> <p06240601d67d2f9e1693@99.111.97.136> <p06240603d67d6aa5ec31@99.111.97.136> <p06240604d67d70904f55@99.111.97.136> <p06240606d67d8fbc9d90@99.111.97.136> <f4ef1525-a2d6-5e8f-2168-31a7cedfd0ff@omnitor.se> <CAOW+2ds2jf+t9fAJ7wHs=mCZjhapU_f4wNoHTNyn7ABZVc-cTg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Eudora for Mac OS X
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 11:51:39 -0800
To: Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>, Gunnar Hellström <gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se>
From: Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org>
Cc: slim@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/slim/w823JVPs-eVIdwKxZxhw8qgzYfU>
Subject: [Slim] Action or not on multiple values in an answer
X-BeenThere: slim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Selection of Language for Internet Media <slim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/slim>, <mailto:slim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/slim/>
List-Post: <mailto:slim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:slim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/slim>, <mailto:slim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 19:51:43 -0000

Bernard: Version -23 was uploaded yesterday.  So the only issue 
remains: do we proceed with -23 or do I upload the version that 
permits multiple values in an answer (per the diff I sent)?

-- 
Randall Gellens
Opinions are personal;    facts are suspect;    I speak for myself only
-------------- Randomly selected tag: ---------------
In the long-run every Government is the exact symbol of its People,
with their wisdom and unwisdom. --Thomas Carlyle, _Past and Present_

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email