Re: [smartobjectdir] Fwd: SGIP Voting Rights

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Wed, 18 January 2012 18:28 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: smartobjectdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: smartobjectdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2F341F0C44; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:28:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_23=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_24=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LOrsOHv9X5ZJ; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:28:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (boreas.isi.edu [128.9.160.161]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0DF91F0C3D; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:28:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [128.9.160.252] (pen.isi.edu [128.9.160.252]) (authenticated bits=0) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q0IIRQUX007441 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:27:26 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4F170F0E.7090403@isi.edu>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:27:26 -0800
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
References: <20F09414D2C12F49A460A931E4907FB790B24DABE0@EXMAIL2.enernex.com> <DFA82AD2-618E-4E46-859B-29888ABE6A5A@ietf.org><F742D45B-314C-4850-92B7-8A6F86BEB550@cisco.com> <002701ccd600$39e38d60$adaaa820$@us> <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A64034A2E86@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net> <61274377-D4EC-4381-9715-A85D9E5112FD@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <61274377-D4EC-4381-9715-A85D9E5112FD@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Cc: "Ersue, Mehmet \(NSN - DE/Munich\)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>, smartobjectdir@ietf.org, IETF Chair <chair@ietf.org>, ext Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
Subject: Re: [smartobjectdir] Fwd: SGIP Voting Rights
X-BeenThere: smartobjectdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <smartobjectdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/smartobjectdir>, <mailto:smartobjectdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/smartobjectdir>
List-Post: <mailto:smartobjectdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:smartobjectdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smartobjectdir>, <mailto:smartobjectdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:28:28 -0000

Well, if the IETF is seen as having a vote there, then we ought to 
maintain it for the IETF.

Not sure what that means or whether that's important to the rest of the 
IETF - the IRSG can decide that...

Joe

On 1/18/2012 9:10 AM, Fred Baker wrote:
> I am the IETF's voting representative. When I am faced with options
> among which to vote, I generally forward the note to this list asking
> for input.
>
> On Jan 18, 2012, at 8:44 AM, Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich) wrote:
>
>> Does IETF vote at all?
>> Mehmet
>> *From:*smartobjectdir-bounces@ietf.org
>> <mailto:smartobjectdir-bounces@ietf.org>[mailto:smartobjectdir-bounces@ietf.org]*On
>> Behalf Of*ext Richard Shockey
>> *Sent:*Wednesday, January 18, 2012 5:43 PM
>> *To:*'Fred Baker'; 'IETF Chair'
>> *Cc:*smartobjectdir@ietf.org <mailto:smartobjectdir@ietf.org>
>> *Subject:*Re: [smartobjectdir] Fwd: SGIP Voting Rights
>> +1 to that sentiment. I gave up on SGIP a long time ago.
>> *From:*smartobjectdir-bounces@ietf.org
>> <mailto:smartobjectdir-bounces@ietf.org>[mailto:smartobjectdir-bounces@ietf.org]*On
>> Behalf Of*Fred Baker
>> *Sent:*Wednesday, January 18, 2012 11:07 AM
>> *To:*IETF Chair
>> *Cc:*smartobjectdir@ietf.org <mailto:smartobjectdir@ietf.org>
>> *Subject:*Re: [smartobjectdir] Fwd: SGIP Voting Rights
>> That's another question. As I replied to her, I was present at the
>> meeting. I frankly think our involvement is more important to them
>> than it is to us.
>> On Jan 18, 2012, at 7:56 AM, IETF Chair wrote:
>>
>> Do we care?
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>> *From:*Janet Roark <janet@enernex.com <mailto:janet@enernex.com>>
>> *Date:*January 18, 2012 10:36:54 AM EST
>> *To:*"fred@cisco.com <mailto:fred@cisco.com>" <fred@cisco.com
>> <mailto:fred@cisco.com>>
>> *Cc:*"chair@ietf.org <mailto:chair@ietf.org>" <chair@ietf.org
>> <mailto:chair@ietf.org>>
>> *Subject: SGIP Voting Rights*
>>
>> Our records show your organization had no attendees at the last
>> Plenary meeting. Therefore, it is important someone attend Friday’s
>> Plenary meeting for your organization to maintain its Voting Rights.
>> Even if you cannot log on exactly at 1pm, if you can arrive sometime
>> between 1 and 3 p.m. Eastern, attendance will be captured for your
>> organization.
>> Link to Register:
>> https://www2.gotomeeting.com/register/444978162
>> Best Regards,
>> SGIP Administrator Team
>> sgipgb.administrator@enernex.com <mailto:sgipgb.administrator@enernex.com>
>> <image003.png>
>> _______________________________________________
>> smartobjectdir mailing list
>> smartobjectdir@ietf.org <mailto:smartobjectdir@ietf.org>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smartobjectdir
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> smartobjectdir mailing list
> smartobjectdir@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smartobjectdir