Re: [smartobjectdir] Charter

Vint Cerf <> Sun, 09 October 2011 12:23 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id F27F821F8B03 for <>; Sun, 9 Oct 2011 05:23:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.977
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2VwLRtF94m0K for <>; Sun, 9 Oct 2011 05:23:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1798921F8AC9 for <>; Sun, 9 Oct 2011 05:23:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by with ESMTP id p99CNUpH032508 for <>; Sun, 9 Oct 2011 05:23:30 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=beta; t=1318163011; bh=VwxCL3dQtDskUfRD4FWVlL0vIRg=; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From: To:Cc:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=JvGVplgQAoLKRZmAfGihk5OF58DMoRuGu1EwpL25/s1ASlLeBdtdjZ0+0iaTvqk4j T/hY2kiF2gwBvnNAIAsHA==
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta;; c=nofws; q=dns; h=dkim-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date: message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:x-system-of-record; b=grCpalyXeRA3JzQjaTEU6f+EtGAZLdXs6DPuKtQ4BXVIYfWYkf3CE+TmclsJI2OXc UEmdTmCZlnAwN3uUHJDhA==
Received: from iaen33 ( []) by with ESMTP id p99CNEOD028213 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <>; Sun, 9 Oct 2011 05:23:29 -0700
Received: by iaen33 with SMTP id n33so7987055iae.2 for <>; Sun, 09 Oct 2011 05:23:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=beta; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ug97KCoDxM7o1xgpRWas8fahan02AlFre31Bt5z2lhw=; b=c4y9VpeklHxOTv4WYGKbtskLZaPeM9PX9v7nclP72FIE2yolNcG41VjPC551rKcLZK zq9UmzyX4esyYtQIC3zA==
Received: by with SMTP id v4mr9231153ict.3.1318163009241; Sun, 09 Oct 2011 05:23:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by with SMTP id v4mr9231146ict.3.1318163009141; Sun, 09 Oct 2011 05:23:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with HTTP; Sun, 9 Oct 2011 05:23:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <> <> <> <>
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2011 08:23:29 -0400
Message-ID: <>
From: Vint Cerf <>
To: Fred Baker <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-System-Of-Record: true
Cc:, JP Vasseur <>
Subject: Re: [smartobjectdir] Charter
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2011 12:23:36 -0000

some people might argue that "management" captures both telemetry and control...


On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Fred Baker <> wrote:
> On Oct 9, 2011, at 5:27 AM, JP Vasseur wrote:
>> There are other terms in us, 6lowpan (sometimes used to refer to IP smart object network, although it does point
>> out to a specific set of technologies, LLN (Low power and Lossy Networks, …).
> I'll argue that those refer to a specific category of such networks, one using IEEE 802.15.4; there are a number of other link layer technologies in use that don't necessarily have the same characteristics and for which 6lowpan isn't obviously relevant. I see tying it to a specific MAC/PHY as a trap. The important thing for us is that IP (of which 6lowpan is a compression) transcends the MAC/PHY in use and potentially connects it to networks composed of more traditional technologies such as IEEE 802.3.
>> Thanks for updating the charter, I would just propose to replace "telemetry and control" by "sensing and actuating".
> Willing enough, although I again see a potential trap. When we talk about industrial automation, management of water displays like the Bellagio Fountains, and so on, "actuating" is a great word in it primary meaning of "cause (a machine or device) to operate"; that goes straight back to Latin. That said, not every "action" in a network is the movement of a device; it also might change the thresholds in the sensor or do some other non-physical thing - that for which we might use the term "configuration". I talk about "control", because it includes both. Similarly, sensing to me is somewhat limited; the obvious meaning would be to somehow measure some physical thing like movement or temperature. In a building control system, it the actions might also include reporting state, such as "you announced that lamp X should change state to 'on'; lamp X is now 'on'". In space communications, the paradigm has been for some time "command and telemetry"; someone tells a satellite or space probe to do something, such as turn a camera in a specific direction, and the continuous stream of data from the satellite/probe might include the direction the camera is pointed. We observe, eventually, that the command has had a certain effect because we see the change in the telemetry it reports. Hence I use the terms "control" and "telemetry", as they include "sensing" and "actuating" but are not limited to their meanings.
> Other opinions?
> _______________________________________________
> smartobjectdir mailing list