[smartpower-interest] New SMART-Power Purchasing Control Model
todd glassey <tglassey@earthlink.net> Mon, 31 May 2010 13:42 UTC
Return-Path: <tglassey@earthlink.net>
X-Original-To: smartpower-interest@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: smartpower-interest@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 0FF1E3A697A for <smartpower-interest@core3.amsl.com>;
Mon, 31 May 2010 06:42:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.200,
BAYES_60=1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2ZX5Oeyi2A2V for
<smartpower-interest@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 May 2010 06:42:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net
(elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.65]) by core3.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B7383A67FF for <smartpower-interest@ietf.org>;
Mon, 31 May 2010 06:42:50 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net;
b=OG+Pbr6zd0ozFOxr1wJdwd++q6SzIU0xVPKCdxXW2ymHBLD4H2fxalO9L/L4UUk/;
h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Received: from [67.180.133.66] (helo=[192.168.1.100]) by
elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from
<tglassey@earthlink.net>) id 1OJ5GJ-0001IR-EH for
smartpower-interest@ietf.org; Mon, 31 May 2010 09:42:39 -0400
Message-ID: <4C03BCCD.3030701@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 06:42:37 -0700
From: todd glassey <tglassey@earthlink.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: smartpower-interest@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------070806000802080700060309"
X-ELNK-Trace: 01b7a7e171bdf5911aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec79111b16b19d5efc5d709cb5bc9d25d070350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 67.180.133.66
Subject: [smartpower-interest] New SMART-Power Purchasing Control Model
X-BeenThere: smartpower-interest@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Smart Power Interest <smartpower-interest.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smartpower-interest>,
<mailto:smartpower-interest-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/smartpower-interest>
List-Post: <mailto:smartpower-interest@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:smartpower-interest-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smartpower-interest>,
<mailto:smartpower-interest-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 13:42:52 -0000
I should mention that we have a new "Protocol for the Announcement of Energy Availability , Negotiation for and then Purchase of Energy" as an algorithmic trading system type operation. It was patent-applied-for prior to its public announcement. As such NO right to use it is conveyed in this announcement (this last comment is to address NoteWell). It's a variant of a system used by Securities Traders today which is fully FINRA and SEC Approved, and why that is important is that the instant a meter can shop and buy power from other provides it will become federally regulated by FINRA, and there is no way around that for anyone. So... the patent for this was filed in March of 2010 and is already registered. The IP is intended to be licensable and there will be an open source version which will implement the basic messaging and control service application protocol over the IP-over-Grid messaging already in place for DASH7 and other appliance type device systems. If you are interested please contact me off list. It is NOT my intent at this time to turn this IP over to the IETF because of what I cite as "gross incompetence in the IETF's legal team and IPR working group" for refusing to put in place a model for IETF IP which will meet those requirements of their sponsor's IP acquisition policies already in use today ... a situation which I assert is well known and which makes control and ownership of any IETF protocol impossible even for the IETF itself, but the people inside seem to intend this to be the case and so turning IP over to the IETF is neither smart or meets the terms and conditions for any of the commercial players here IMHO. This is what happens when you put people in charge of the IETF who's professional salaries are paid to allow them to continue dominating and preventing others from working with and in advancing efforts inside the IETF itself. Todd Glassey
- [smartpower-interest] New SMART-Power Purchasing … todd glassey
- Re: [smartpower-interest] New SMART-Power Purchas… sujay gupta
- Re: [smartpower-interest] New SMART-Power Purchas… todd glassey
- Re: [smartpower-interest] New SMART-Power Purchas… Fred Baker
- Re: [smartpower-interest] New SMART-Power Purchas… todd glassey