Re: [smartpower-interest] Question re draft-tsou-opsawg-network-configuration

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 11 November 2010 02:51 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: smartpower-interest@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: smartpower-interest@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56A913A695D for <smartpower-interest@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 18:51:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j7l41LaRge4U for <smartpower-interest@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 18:51:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9:209:3dff:fe00:7136]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A0893A6982 for <smartpower-interest@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 18:51:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.224.120]) by informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oAB2pkVM026157; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 03:51:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: from dhcp-74d4.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-74d4.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.116.212]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1D6E68E8; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 03:51:44 +0100 (CET)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <997CF89F-E2F1-4CC1-8B60-BDAE399A0012@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 10:51:41 +0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <035688D4-199A-4083-8F0B-D3F9CE01E76A@tzi.org>
References: <997CF89F-E2F1-4CC1-8B60-BDAE399A0012@cisco.com>
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Cc: draft-tsou-opsawg-network-configuration@tools.ietf.org, smartpower-interest@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [smartpower-interest] Question re draft-tsou-opsawg-network-configuration
X-BeenThere: smartpower-interest@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Smart Power Interest <smartpower-interest.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smartpower-interest>, <mailto:smartpower-interest-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/smartpower-interest>
List-Post: <mailto:smartpower-interest@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:smartpower-interest-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smartpower-interest>, <mailto:smartpower-interest-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 02:51:33 -0000

On Nov 11, 2010, at 10:28, Fred Baker wrote:

> This morning I became aware of draft-tsou-opsawg-network-configuration. Is this interesting from a Smart Power perspective?

This draft ties nicely into the commissioning/bootstrapping discussion we have had/are having in the 6LoWPAN and CoRE WGs.

Definitely interesting!

(Of course, the constrained node/network cluster of working groups would probably be interested to make this work with specifications that are appropriate for constrained environments.  Lots of opportunity for inter-WG coordination...)

Gruesse, Carsten