IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [smartpower-interest] Question re draft-tsou-opsawg-network-configuration

Tina TSOU <tena@huawei.com> Thu, 11 November 2010 03:20 UTC

Return-Path: <tena@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: smartpower-interest@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: smartpower-interest@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 821F23A6951 for <smartpower-interest@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 19:20:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.82
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.82 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.779, BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_I_INVITATION=-2, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LmCndMR7Cep2 for <smartpower-interest@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 19:20:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from usaga01-in.huawei.com (usaga01-in.huawei.com [206.16.17.211]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A36B3A67F6 for <smartpower-interest@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 19:20:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (usaga01-in [172.18.4.6]) by usaga01-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LBP00J1DAN8YI@usaga01-in.huawei.com> for smartpower-interest@ietf.org; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 19:21:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-72cb.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-72cb.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.114.203]) by usaga01-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0LBP008VFAN5Q0@usaga01-in.huawei.com> for smartpower-interest@ietf.org; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 19:21:08 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 11:21:05 +0800
From: Tina TSOU <tena@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <035688D4-199A-4083-8F0B-D3F9CE01E76A@tzi.org>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Message-id: <49E0D7BA-3BE2-4CC1-8926-E009917BC261@huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
References: <997CF89F-E2F1-4CC1-8B60-BDAE399A0012@cisco.com> <035688D4-199A-4083-8F0B-D3F9CE01E76A@tzi.org>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 15:08:34 -0800
Cc: draft-tsou-opsawg-network-configuration@tools.ietf.org, smartpower-interest@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [smartpower-interest] Question re draft-tsou-opsawg-network-configuration
X-BeenThere: smartpower-interest@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Smart Power Interest <smartpower-interest.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smartpower-interest>, <mailto:smartpower-interest-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/smartpower-interest>
List-Post: <mailto:smartpower-interest@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:smartpower-interest-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smartpower-interest>, <mailto:smartpower-interest-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 03:20:41 -0000

B. R.
Tina
http://tinatsou.weebly.com




On Nov 11, 2010, at 10:51 AM, Carsten Bormann wrote:

> On Nov 11, 2010, at 10:28, Fred Baker wrote:
>
>> This morning I became aware of draft-tsou-opsawg-network- 
>> configuration. Is this interesting from a Smart Power perspective?
>
> This draft ties nicely into the commissioning/bootstrapping  
> discussion we have had/are having in the 6LoWPAN and CoRE WGs.
>
> Definitely interesting!
>
> (Of course, the constrained node/network cluster of working groups  
> would probably be interested to make this work with specifications  
> that are appropriate for constrained environments.  Lots of  
> opportunity for inter-WG coordination...)
Sure, if I remember correctly, I presented it in CoRE WG before, per  
the invitation from Carsten.
>
> Gruesse, Carsten
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email