Re: [smartpower-interest] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-baker-ietf-core-10

Is the modifier "excellent" really needed?

spt

On 11/10/2010 2:11 PM, Samita Chakrabarti wrote:
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> One minor nit:
>
> s/'RFCs 5191 and 5193'/'RFC 5191 and RFC 5193'/
>
> Thanks,
> -Samita
>
>>
>> I agree with Yoshi's suggestion. Modified text...
>>
>> "When used in conjunction with EAP-TLS (RFC 5216), IEEE 802.1X offers
>> excellent access security for wired or wireless IEEE 802 LANs. PANA (RFCs
>> 5191 and 5193) is also gaining traction for access security for Zigbee IP
>> networks."
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11/10/2010 12:48 AM, Yoshihiro Ohba wrote:
>>> (2010/11/10 14:02), Paul Duffy wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "When used in conjunction with RFC 5216 EAP-TLS, IEEE 802.1X offers
>>>> excellent access security for wired or wireless IEEE 802 LANs.
>>>> Further, Protocol for Carrying  Authentication for Network Access
>>>> (PANA) is gaining traction for access security for Zigbee IP networks."
>>> This text is also fine with me.  But please add reference to RFC 5191
>>> (or preferably both RFC 5191 and RFC 5193), for PANA.
>>>
>>> Yoshihiro Ohba
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> smartpower-interest mailing list
>>> smartpower-interest@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smartpower-interest
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> smartpower-interest mailing list
>> smartpower-interest@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smartpower-interest
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> smartpower-interest mailing list
> smartpower-interest@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smartpower-interest
>